1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01754.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Potential Negative Social Consequences of Cigarette Smoking: Marketing Research in Reverse1

Abstract: The effects of cigarette smoking on first impressions were examined in an interlocking series of studies. Provided college students evaluated peers who were neither extremely attractive nor unattractive, smoking typically reduced the positivity of evaluations regardless of participants' smoking. Targets photographed with smoking material were rated, for example, to be less considerate, calm, disciplined, honest, healthy, well-mannered, and happy than when smoking material was absent. Replication with apparentl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One important negative perception associated with smokers is that of lower cleanliness (Dermer and Jacobsen 1986). Non-smokers especially tend to perceive smokers as being less clean than non-smokers (Seiter et al 2010).…”
Section: Stable Attitudes and Situational Factors As Moderators Of Rementioning
confidence: 96%
“…One important negative perception associated with smokers is that of lower cleanliness (Dermer and Jacobsen 1986). Non-smokers especially tend to perceive smokers as being less clean than non-smokers (Seiter et al 2010).…”
Section: Stable Attitudes and Situational Factors As Moderators Of Rementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, several researchers have found that Black, Hispanic, and Asian instructors receive lower evaluation ratings than White instructors (e.g., Glascock and Ruggiero 2006;Hendrix 1997Hendrix , 1998McCroskey 2002McCroskey , 2003Rubin 1998), and that gay instructors receive lower evaluation ratings than straight instructors (e.g., Crandall and Cohen 1994;Ewing et al 2003;Russ et al 2002). Though no research has yet investigated potential biases specifically against instructors who smoke, a multitude of studies reveal that students do hold prejudicial biases against individuals who smoke (Amos et al 1998;Biasco and Hartnett 2002;Brosh et al 2003;Chambliss et al 2006;Cooper and Kohn 1989;Dermer and Jacobsen 1986;Echabe et al 1994;Moore 2005;Tokheim et al 1990). Conceivably, then, students may be biased against and give lower evaluation ratings to instructors who smoke than to instructors who do not smoke.…”
Section: Instructor Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, these students rate smokers as less attractive (Amos et al 1998;Biasco and Hartnett 2002;Cooper and Kohn 1989), less happy (Amos et al 1998;Dermer and Jacobsen 1986;Echabe et al 1994), less intelligent (Chambliss et al 2006;Cooper and Kohn 1989;Echabe et al 1994), less disciplined (Chambliss et al 2006;Dermer and Jacobsen 1986;Tokheim et al 1990), and less ambitious (Chambliss et al 2006;Moore 2005) than nonsmokers. This past research reveals that students do stigmatize and hold prejudicial biases against people who smoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research has shown that nonsmokers have generally developed an unflattering and highly stigmatized view of the smoker. These perceptions span nearly all aspects of personality, but the stigma against smokers who are among the most relevant to the current study is that they are more hostile and less likeable, considerate, moral, and have worse manners than do nonsmokers (Bleda & Sandman, ; Clark, Klesges, & Neimeyer, ; Dermer & Jacobsen, ). In an article discussing the disdain that smokers often provoke from nonsmokers, Gibson () wrote, “As with any other case in which one group holds unfounded stereotypes of another, it would be ideal if a method for overcoming these stereotypes could be proposed.” The current study will demonstrate that it appears smokers may have done just that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%