2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet surprisingly few studies explore the managerial challenges and governance principles of teams moving beyond a hierarchical preconception of the organization, and keep treating teams as rather static organizational forms or entities (e.g. Keller, 2001; Kuipers & de Witte, 2005) instead of studying them as developed by both endogenous and exogenous relations (exceptions are Garibaldo & Rebecchi, 2004; Vallas, 2003). In contrast, the intra- and inter-relational dynamics of team communities form our focal point.…”
Section: Studying Teams As Co-creative Economic Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet surprisingly few studies explore the managerial challenges and governance principles of teams moving beyond a hierarchical preconception of the organization, and keep treating teams as rather static organizational forms or entities (e.g. Keller, 2001; Kuipers & de Witte, 2005) instead of studying them as developed by both endogenous and exogenous relations (exceptions are Garibaldo & Rebecchi, 2004; Vallas, 2003). In contrast, the intra- and inter-relational dynamics of team communities form our focal point.…”
Section: Studying Teams As Co-creative Economic Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space of a group, placed in a given context, is not a space in which to implement a project of change, but a space which allows for the study of complex and changing realities and provides the opportunity to analyse in which direction the changes are driving the institution and the individuals concerned. Observation by a discussion group can thus be conceived as an effective means of studying how the participants, the breakdowns in communication, the emotions that permeate the experience, and so on, are interrelated and of proposing hypotheses by analysing the dynamics that provoke the breakdowns (Garibaldo and Rebecchi, 2004).…”
Section: The Search Conferencementioning
confidence: 99%