1996
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-96-00678-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some results on pseudosquares

Abstract: Abstract. If p is an odd prime, the pseudosquare Lp is defined to be the least positive nonsquare integer such that Lp ≡ 1 (mod 8) and the Legendre symbol (Lp/q) = 1 for all odd primes q ≤ p. In this paper we first discuss the connection between pseudosquares and primality testing. We then describe a new numerical sieving device which was used to extend the table of known pseudosquares up to L 271 . We also present several numerical results concerning the growth rate of the pseudosquares, results which so far … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If x (r−1)/2 mod r = r − 1 then x is locally non-square at r. If x (r−1)/2 mod r = 0 then x is divisible by r but, being squarefree, not by r 2 , so it is locally non-square at r. A series of previous computations, initiated by Kraitchik in 1924 and continued by Lehmer, Lehmer, Shanks, Patterson, Williams, Stephens, and Lukes, showed with considerably more effort that r ≤ 281 for all x up to about 7 · 10 19 ≈ 2 66 . See [9], [10], [11], [17], [14, page 134], and [15]. For example, the computation of Lukes, Patterson, and Williams in [15] was a focused enumeration of all small y such that 1 + 24y is a non-unit square modulo m 1 = 5 · 7 · 11 · 13; there are about H/27 such values of y in [1, H].…”
Section: Doubly Focused Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If x (r−1)/2 mod r = r − 1 then x is locally non-square at r. If x (r−1)/2 mod r = 0 then x is divisible by r but, being squarefree, not by r 2 , so it is locally non-square at r. A series of previous computations, initiated by Kraitchik in 1924 and continued by Lehmer, Lehmer, Shanks, Patterson, Williams, Stephens, and Lukes, showed with considerably more effort that r ≤ 281 for all x up to about 7 · 10 19 ≈ 2 66 . See [9], [10], [11], [17], [14, page 134], and [15]. For example, the computation of Lukes, Patterson, and Williams in [15] was a focused enumeration of all small y such that 1 + 24y is a non-unit square modulo m 1 = 5 · 7 · 11 · 13; there are about H/27 such values of y in [1, H].…”
Section: Doubly Focused Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [9], [10], [11], [17], [14, page 134], and [15]. For example, the computation of Lukes, Patterson, and Williams in [15] was a focused enumeration of all small y such that 1 + 24y is a non-unit square modulo m 1 = 5 · 7 · 11 · 13; there are about H/27 such values of y in [1, H]. My computation was a doubly focused enumeration, as explained in Section 2 and Section 3, of all small y such that 1 + 24y is a non-unit square modulo both 25 .…”
Section: Doubly Focused Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [6], Granville, Mollin and Williams prove the following theorem: For the computational aspect, they used the Manitoba Scalable Sieving Unit, a very powerful sieving machine (see [8] for more details). They ran the machine for a period of 5 months to produce three tables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses an Eratosthenes-like sieve followed by the pseudosquares prime test of Lukes, Patterson, and Williams [14] (which effectively includes a base-2 pseudoprime test). Our sieve has a conjectured running time of O(n log n) arithmetic operations and O((log n)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%