2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40323-019-0130-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some robust integrators for large time dynamics

Abstract: This article reviews some integrators particularly suitable for the numerical resolution of differential equations on a large time interval. Symplectic integrators are presented. Their stability on exponentially large time is shown through numerical examples. Next, Dirac integrators for constrained systems are exposed. An application on chaotic dynamics is presented. Lastly, for systems having no exploitable geometric structure, the Borel-Laplace integrator is presented. Numerical experiments on Hamiltonian an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in his subsequent works, Courant focused only on their geometric properties. Applications to mechanics occurred later in the works on implicit Lagrangian [2][3][4][5] and port-Hamiltonian [6,7] systems, which are discussed in the next two sections.…”
Section: Courant Algebroid and Dirac Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in his subsequent works, Courant focused only on their geometric properties. Applications to mechanics occurred later in the works on implicit Lagrangian [2][3][4][5] and port-Hamiltonian [6,7] systems, which are discussed in the next two sections.…”
Section: Courant Algebroid and Dirac Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more detail, this construction was described in [4,5]. In this paper, having omitted the technical details, we provide only the final equations that define :…”
Section: Implicit Lagrangian Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural question to ask oneself is about optimality of the choice of̃, and various arguments and consistency tests are possible in favour of one or another. For example, if a regression of Dirac-1 is considered without constraints, it is meaningful to ask whether it is symplecticthis question is addressed among others in [19]. We intend to study this choice in a separate (maybe rather short and technical) article, devoted exclusively to benchmarking and analysis of Dirac-based numerical method in different situations.…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise question we ask ourselves in this paper is mostly motivated by the results of [1], where the appearance of (almost) Dirac structures for mechanical systems with constraints is discussed. It can be vaguely formulated as: "given a Dirac structure, what else do we need to know to define meaningful dynamics on it".…”
Section: Introduction / Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%