1965
DOI: 10.2307/3798548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Sources of Error in Using Pellet-Group Counts for Censusing Deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
4

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of difference may be due to the relatively long persistence of pellets on xeric sites (Harestad and Bunnell, 1987). Pellets on dry sites with sparse vegetation often persist for many years in a relatively unchanged condition (Van Etten and Bennet, 1965). Some of the pellet groups on our xeric sites may have been deposited before or soon after the wolf reintroduction of 1995, confounding our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…This lack of difference may be due to the relatively long persistence of pellets on xeric sites (Harestad and Bunnell, 1987). Pellets on dry sites with sparse vegetation often persist for many years in a relatively unchanged condition (Van Etten and Bennet, 1965). Some of the pellet groups on our xeric sites may have been deposited before or soon after the wolf reintroduction of 1995, confounding our results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Para estimar la densidad de venados se utilizó el modelo propuesto por Eberhardt y Van Etten [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] con base en la fórmula y una tasa de defecación de 12.7 grupos fecales por individuo por día ya que es la tasa de defecación que más se ha utilizado para estimaciones en bosques templados. Con esta fórmula se estima el número de individuos por kilometro cuadrado: …”
Section: Estimación De La Densidad De La Poblaciónunclassified
“…Plot size and number depend on herbivore type and density, spatial variability in amounts of dung being less in small animals and ones that defecate more frequently. In the above-mentioned study with species ranging in size from grouse to cattle, there were eight plots per site, each of 15 m 2 and having long narrow shape to prevent dung being overlooked (van Etten & Bennett 1965). Volumes of dung are usually determined by displacement of water in 1 or 2-litre polythene cylinders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%