“…In keeping with this assertion, my research contains more than a strategy for tapping into a more inclusive idea of family life-it is an attempt to create and prioritize devalued knowledge from the places and experiences that queer people consider meaningful to them/us, and also a challenge to "traditional" methods that limit our ways of seeing the social world in favor of an innovative scavenger or preservation methods that queer research. My research, thus, adds to a small but tenacious-and recently reinvigorated (Brim and Ghaziani, 2016)-tradition of innovating with and for queer people in research, building on, for instance, the use of desire and flirtation to critically engage with power in research relationships (Tweedy, 2016), the use of geographical-spatial research based on queer-feminist principles (Misgav, 2016), the use of queer theory to trouble the public/private binary in equality discourse (Dadas, 2016), the use of community-led storytelling (Valentine, 2016), and even the reclamation of quantitative methods and emergent technologies to promote queer indeterminacy (Haber, 2016), to name but a few recent examples of queer methods. Furthermore, my queer method emanates from my own community, as much research with LGBTQ+ individuals does, and so resonates with Dahl's (2016) observations about what she terms queer femme-inist research:…”