2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11230-005-5486-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Species of Centrorhynchus Lühe, 1911 (Acanthocephala: Centrorhynchidae) from the Collection of the Natural History Museum, London

Abstract: Seven species of Centrorhynchus Lühe, 1911 are present in the Parasitic Worms Collection of The Natural History Museum, London: C. aluconis (Müller, 1780) Lühe, 1911 from Strix aluco Linnaeus in Great Britain; C. buteonis (Schrank, 1788) Kostylev, 1914 from Accipiter virgatus (Temminck) (new host record) in Sri Lanka (new geographical record); C. clitorideus (Meyer, 1931) Golvan, 1956 from Athene brama (Temminck) (new host record) in India; C. crotophagicola Schmidt and Neiland, 1966 (encysted juveniles in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were 16-48 longitudinal rows of 8-40 each [6]. Especially, it was 28-29 longitudinal rows of 15-16 hooks in Centrorhynchus aluconis [7], 30-32 rows of 12 in Centrorhynchus cinctum [8], similar to 29-33 × 12-13 in the present worms. In addition, the testes were in the anterior portion of the trunk, and the number of cement glands was 3, fitting the criteria of 3-6 [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…were 16-48 longitudinal rows of 8-40 each [6]. Especially, it was 28-29 longitudinal rows of 15-16 hooks in Centrorhynchus aluconis [7], 30-32 rows of 12 in Centrorhynchus cinctum [8], similar to 29-33 × 12-13 in the present worms. In addition, the testes were in the anterior portion of the trunk, and the number of cement glands was 3, fitting the criteria of 3-6 [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In this study, the detailed species identification was not possible due to the absence of full development and intrauterine eggs of the worm. Centrorhynchus is the largest acanthocephalan genus having almost 90 species, and these are parasites mainly of birds of the orders Falconiformes and Strigiformes [7]. Hence, an experimental infection into birds should be the first target to be examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightening of specimens from the Adenopohorea, Secernentea, and Paleacanthocephala classes was carried out using glycerine or lactophenol. The species identifi cation was conducted according to Dubois (1968Dubois ( , 1970, Gibson et al (2002), Sitko (1998Sitko ( , 2001, and Bray et al (2008) for Trematoda ;Joyeux & Timon-David (1934), Joyeux & Baer (1936), Rausch (1948, and Khalil et al (1994) for Cestoda; Hartwich (1975), Baruš et al (1978), and Gibbons (2010) for Adenophorea; and Secernentea and Meyer (1933), Petrochenko (1958), Dimitrova et al (1997), and Dimitrova & Gibson (2005) for Paleacanthocephala. Ecological parameters (prevalence, mean intensity, diversity) were evaluated according to Bush et al (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt and Neiland (1966) characterized this species by the presence of 15 -17 hooks per rows, of which the first 8 -9 in each row have well-developed roots, being the remaining hooks rootless but with strong anteriorly directed manubrium, without detailing the presence of transitional hooks. Later, Dimitrova and Gibson (2005) described encysted juveniles of this species from Anolis lineatopus lineatopus Grey and A. sagrei Duméril &Bibron from Jamaica and reported new data for the pattern of hooks per row: 8 -9 + 3 + 4-5 (exceptionally 6). The most important morphological differences between the proboscis armature of the new species and C. crotophagicola, are the greater number of hooks per longitudinal row (18 versus 15 -17) and the greater number of transitional hooks (4 versus 3).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Longirostris) polymorphus; posteriorly, Golvan (1960) and Yamaguti (1963) consider it as C. polymorphus and Dimitrova and Gibson (2005) believe that this species better fits Sphaerirostris Golvan 1956 than Centrorhynchus due to the shape and size of the body and proboscis.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%