Polypropylene Structure, Blends and Composites 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0523-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some wetting and adhesion phenomena in polypropylene composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (2) was shown to correlate well with experimental observations of polypropylene wetting a glass surface [14]. This indicates that the local wetting inside fiber bundles, in particular at a low global pressure, will be positively affected by a low polymer viscosity and a strong physical interaction between the liquid and the fiber surface.…”
Section: Capillary Phenomena and Micro-impregnationsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (2) was shown to correlate well with experimental observations of polypropylene wetting a glass surface [14]. This indicates that the local wetting inside fiber bundles, in particular at a low global pressure, will be positively affected by a low polymer viscosity and a strong physical interaction between the liquid and the fiber surface.…”
Section: Capillary Phenomena and Micro-impregnationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Its behavior was Newtonian at shear rates below 10 s 1 ; as the shear rate in the matrix during impregnation was estimated to be approximately 1 s −1 , the matrix behavior can thus be considered Newtonian. The value of the surface tension for the polypropylene is given as γ lv = 0.0208 N/m, and the static contact angle on glass is taken as θ = 0 [14]. A model matrix consisting of polyethylene glycol (PEG) mixed with water was used to perform experiments at room temperature.…”
Section: Matrix Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibre surface is clean and there are no PP residuals on fibre surface which indicates that interface is the weakest link in these composites. Figure 13 (b) shows that in some regions fibres were impregnated whereas some regions contain PP only [24,25].…”
Section: Composite Materials Microstructure and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Laplace transform of compliance functions can be calculated using Equation (43) and the engineering constants for the matrix in the Laplace domain can be calculated using Equations (32). Then the engineering constants for UD composite in the Laplace domain can be calculated using Equations (A2.1)-(A2.9) and the element of compliance and stiffness matrices for UD composite using Equations (A1.3) and Equation (7). Stiffness and compliance for GMT in the Laplace domain are calculated using Equations (25) and (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is explained in Reference [4] by insufficient wetting of PP into glass fiber and poor fiber-matrix adhesion from heat treatment of the fibers. Elmendorp [7] states that a clear disadvantage of the polypropylene (PP) is its small degree of polarity, which leads to limited wettability as well as to adhesion issues in its use as a matrix material for composite materials such as glass mat thermoplastics. It can result in unwetted areas, voids, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%