1995
DOI: 10.2307/2138098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Son Preference in Vietnam

Abstract: This article assesses the strength of son preference in Vietnam, as reflected in fertility behavior. It formulates and estimates a proportional hazards model applied to birth intervals, and a contraceptive prevalence model, using household survey data from 2,636 ever-married women aged 15-49 with at least one living child who were interviewed for the Vietnam Living Standards Survey 1992-1993. Son preference is found to be strong by world standards, but nevertheless, it has a minor effect on fertility; in its a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Son preference strongly influences fertility decisions. 27 Producing a son reflects on the value of the wife in the eyes of the family and society. Vietnamese women use a range of strategies to secure a son, including traditional folk methods thought to facilitate male contraception, continuing childbearing until a son is born, adopting a male child and terminating female fetuses.…”
Section: Son Preference and Small Family Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son preference strongly influences fertility decisions. 27 Producing a son reflects on the value of the wife in the eyes of the family and society. Vietnamese women use a range of strategies to secure a son, including traditional folk methods thought to facilitate male contraception, continuing childbearing until a son is born, adopting a male child and terminating female fetuses.…”
Section: Son Preference and Small Family Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.g. in China (Tu, 1991), in Bangladesh (Rahman & DaVanzo., 1993), in the Chinese population of Malaysia (Pong, 1994), in Vietnam (Haughton & Haughton, 1995), in India (Arnold, Choe, & Roy., 1998), in South Korea (Larsen, Chung, & Gupta, 1998), and in Taiwan (Tsay & Chu, 2005). find no evidence of gender preferences among non-users ; for them, we cannot tell whether they have no preferences or are not able to translate them into fertility choices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, some studies have found that son preference is associated with a larger ideal family size 17 and discourages women of lower parities from using contraceptives, which in turn acts as a barrier to reducing fertility. 33 On the other hand, data from the Matlab Demographic Surveillance System revealed no evidence that son preference influences contraceptive use in Bangladesh, 22 and studies have found only minor to modest effects on contraceptive use and fertility in Vietnam 34 and Nepal. 23 The authors of the Nepalese study estimated that contraceptive use would increase by only 8% and fertility would decrease by just 6% in the absence of son preference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%