2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12983-014-0083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Song characteristics track bill morphology along a gradient of urbanization in house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus)

Abstract: IntroductionUrbanization can considerably impact animal ecology, evolution, and behavior. Among the new conditions that animals experience in cities is anthropogenic noise, which can limit the sound space available for animals to communicate using acoustic signals. Some urban bird species increase their song frequencies so that they can be heard above low-frequency background city noise. However, the ability to make such song modifications may be constrained by several morphological factors, including bill gap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation in bill morphology within and between species has been interpreted in light of differences in foraging behaviour and diet, and studies of the avian bill provide some of the most compelling evidence of the effects of food supply on a morphological trait (Bowman, ; Smith, ; Remsen, ; Benkman, ; Giuliano, Griggio & Pilastro, ; Herrel et al ., , ; Badyaev et al ., ). Behaviours such as vocalisation also contribute to the evolution of bill size (Fletcher, ; Hausberger, Black & Richard, ; Brittan‐Powell et al ., ; Podos & Nowicki, ; Podos, Southall & Rossi‐Santos, ; Giraudeau et al ., ), implicating reproductive trade‐offs in bill size. Indeed, extreme bill sizes, such as the large‐billed toucans, were interpreted by Darwin () to result from sexual selection, suggesting that bill size plays a role in sex‐specific traits, such as mate selection or vocalisation (Greenberg & Olsen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in bill morphology within and between species has been interpreted in light of differences in foraging behaviour and diet, and studies of the avian bill provide some of the most compelling evidence of the effects of food supply on a morphological trait (Bowman, ; Smith, ; Remsen, ; Benkman, ; Giuliano, Griggio & Pilastro, ; Herrel et al ., , ; Badyaev et al ., ). Behaviours such as vocalisation also contribute to the evolution of bill size (Fletcher, ; Hausberger, Black & Richard, ; Brittan‐Powell et al ., ; Podos & Nowicki, ; Podos, Southall & Rossi‐Santos, ; Giraudeau et al ., ), implicating reproductive trade‐offs in bill size. Indeed, extreme bill sizes, such as the large‐billed toucans, were interpreted by Darwin () to result from sexual selection, suggesting that bill size plays a role in sex‐specific traits, such as mate selection or vocalisation (Greenberg & Olsen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the genetic song template [63, 69–71]), or even anatomical or physiological traits that affect song production (e.g. body size [39, 72], or bill morphology [41]). Morphologically-mediated population differences in sound frequency are perhaps less likely because, although urban juncos are slightly smaller than mountain juncos, there is no detectable relationship between body size and song frequency in either of our field populations [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this method, we were able to estimate the volume of a greater percentage of prey items (57.4% rather than 32.4%). We used the average length and height of the bills of Great Tits in European populations (12 and 4.5 mm, respectively; Zaja z c 1999, BWPi 2006) to create the size categories, but investigators should measure the bills of birds in their own study populations because bill sizes may differ among countries (Bosse et al 2017), populations (Ulfstrand et al 1981), and habitats (Giraudeau et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%