2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.61610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Songbirds can learn flexible contextual control over syllable sequencing

Abstract: The flexible control of sequential behavior is a fundamental aspect of speech, enabling endless reordering of a limited set of learned vocal elements (syllables or words). Songbirds are phylogenetically distant from humans but share both the capacity for vocal learning and neural circuitry for vocal control that includes direct pallial-brainstem projections. Based on these similarities, we hypothesized that songbirds might likewise be able to learn flexible, moment-by-moment control over vocalizations. Here, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a commonly used experimental manipulation to induce adaptive changes in the acoustic structure of adult song elements was first reported in BFs ( Tumer and Brainard, 2007 ) and the neural mechanisms of such song changes have been intensively studied in both BFs and ZFs ( Andalman and Fee, 2009 ; Charlesworth et al, 2012 ; Gadagkar et al, 2016 ; Hisey et al, 2018 ; Xiao et al, 2018 ; Tachibana et al, 2022 ). Because of the vocal learning ability and underlying neural circuits largely shared between these species, most studies have used them with little attention to species differences, although a limited number of studies took advantage of variable syllable sequencing in BF songs ( Okanoya, 2004 ; Warren et al, 2012 ; Lipkind et al, 2013 ; Polomova et al, 2019 ; Veit et al, 2021 ). The current study systematically compared the behavioral properties of singing between the two species and investigated the underlying mechanisms, revealing previously unknown differences between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a commonly used experimental manipulation to induce adaptive changes in the acoustic structure of adult song elements was first reported in BFs ( Tumer and Brainard, 2007 ) and the neural mechanisms of such song changes have been intensively studied in both BFs and ZFs ( Andalman and Fee, 2009 ; Charlesworth et al, 2012 ; Gadagkar et al, 2016 ; Hisey et al, 2018 ; Xiao et al, 2018 ; Tachibana et al, 2022 ). Because of the vocal learning ability and underlying neural circuits largely shared between these species, most studies have used them with little attention to species differences, although a limited number of studies took advantage of variable syllable sequencing in BF songs ( Okanoya, 2004 ; Warren et al, 2012 ; Lipkind et al, 2013 ; Polomova et al, 2019 ; Veit et al, 2021 ). The current study systematically compared the behavioral properties of singing between the two species and investigated the underlying mechanisms, revealing previously unknown differences between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But to what extent is targeted vocal planning an entirely human ability? Many animals are capable of volitional control of vocalizations ( 1, 2 ), but are they also capable of planning to selectively adapt their vocalizations towards a target, such as when striving to reduce the pitch mismatch of a note in a song? Target-specific vocal planning is a cognitive ability that requires extracting or recalling a sensory target and forming or selecting the required motor actions to reach the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, rapid adaptation in response to changing environmental contexts has been demonstrated in both birdsong [80][81][82] and human speech [83]. This apparent plasticity of a well learned, crystalized behavior suggests that vocalization may be controlled by a "malleable template," in which trial-by-trial variability is used to adapt learned behaviors [84].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%