2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep05508
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soot superaggregates from flaming wildfires and their direct radiative forcing

Abstract: Wildfires contribute significantly to global soot emissions, yet their aerosol formation mechanisms and resulting particle properties are poorly understood and parameterized in climate models. The conventional view holds that soot is formed via the cluster-dilute aggregation mechanism in wildfires and emitted as aggregates with fractal dimension Df ≈ 1.8 mobility diameter Dm ≤ 1 μm, and aerodynamic diameter Da ≤ 300 nm. Here we report the ubiquitous presence of soot superaggregates (SAs) in the outflow from a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), similar to those observed from several wildfires in Chakrabarty et al (2014) and from a laboratory fire in Kearney and Pierce (2012). Superaggregates tend to have larger mobility diameters than smaller particles; however, they have low aerodynamic diameters (a measure of their terminal settling velocity), lower effective densities, and are more porous, causing different behavior than primary particles or smaller aggregates (Chakrabarty et al, 2014;Kulkarni et al, 2011a). In Chakrabarty et al (2014), superaggregates were collected in the third stage of an aerosol impactor with a cut point of < 0.3 µm aerodynamic diameter (D a ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3), similar to those observed from several wildfires in Chakrabarty et al (2014) and from a laboratory fire in Kearney and Pierce (2012). Superaggregates tend to have larger mobility diameters than smaller particles; however, they have low aerodynamic diameters (a measure of their terminal settling velocity), lower effective densities, and are more porous, causing different behavior than primary particles or smaller aggregates (Chakrabarty et al, 2014;Kulkarni et al, 2011a). In Chakrabarty et al (2014), superaggregates were collected in the third stage of an aerosol impactor with a cut point of < 0.3 µm aerodynamic diameter (D a ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Preliminary images of the filters from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) seemed to support the hypothesis that these large particles were fire-generated superaggregates (Fig. 3), similar to those observed from several wildfires in Chakrabarty et al (2014) and from a laboratory fire in Kearney and Pierce (2012). Superaggregates tend to have larger mobility diameters than smaller particles; however, they have low aerodynamic diameters (a measure of their terminal settling velocity), lower effective densities, and are more porous, causing different behavior than primary particles or smaller aggregates (Chakrabarty et al, 2014;Kulkarni et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A tunable particle-cluster aggregation algorithm is applied to generate 30 the FAs (Filippov et al, 2000;Liu et al, 2012), and the coating sphere is added with its center located at the mass center of compact FA. Three transmission or scanning electron microscope images of BC particles are also given in the figure for comparison (Burr et al, 2012;Lewis et al, 2009;Freney et al, 2010), and we can see that the numerically generated 1997; Sorensen, 2000;Brasil et al, 2000;Chakrabarty et al, 2014) have been widely used for numerical studies, and are applied here to represent realistic BC particles (Liu and Mishchenko, 2005;Smith and Grainger, 2014;Li et al, 2016). The diameter of the same-sized monomers is set to 30 nm, and the fractal prefactor of 1.2 is used.…”
Section: Bc Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in general, the rain samples had many larger BC aggregates (> 200 nm), whereas BC aggregates found in the ice cores were significantly smaller (∼ 100 nm) and displayed a much more compact structure. Rain samples also contained numerous superaggregates as described in (Chakrabarty et al, 2014). These superaggregates were > 1 µm in diameter and were absent in the ice cores (Fig.…”
Section: Transmission Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 67%