2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11237-019-09628-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption and Diffusion of Methanol and Ethanol in Macroporous Sulfonic Resin Amberlyst 15

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the macroporous resins, ΔTOF becomes even negative, since, for this catalyst, TOF for ethanol etherification is higher compared to isopropanol. A comparison of TOF for ETBE and IPTBE formation with mass transfer and adsorption characteristics shows that the higher TOF's correspond to a higher diffusion coefficient (7.2×10 −14 сm 2 ·s −1 ) and Henry's constants (234 сm 3 ·g −1 ) for ethanol, compared to isopropanol (1.2×10 −14 сm 2 ·s −1 and 104 сm 3 ·g −1 , respectively) 126 . Therefore, the high reactivity of the acid sites of macroporous sulfonic resin to ethanol is explained by the lower diffusion difficulties and higher adsorption capacity for ethanol, in comparison with larger isopropanol molecules (the kinetic diameters of EtOH and i‐ PrOH are 4.3 and 4.6 Å 127 …”
Section: Role Of the Morphology Of Sulfonic Resin Catalysts In The Et...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the macroporous resins, ΔTOF becomes even negative, since, for this catalyst, TOF for ethanol etherification is higher compared to isopropanol. A comparison of TOF for ETBE and IPTBE formation with mass transfer and adsorption characteristics shows that the higher TOF's correspond to a higher diffusion coefficient (7.2×10 −14 сm 2 ·s −1 ) and Henry's constants (234 сm 3 ·g −1 ) for ethanol, compared to isopropanol (1.2×10 −14 сm 2 ·s −1 and 104 сm 3 ·g −1 , respectively) 126 . Therefore, the high reactivity of the acid sites of macroporous sulfonic resin to ethanol is explained by the lower diffusion difficulties and higher adsorption capacity for ethanol, in comparison with larger isopropanol molecules (the kinetic diameters of EtOH and i‐ PrOH are 4.3 and 4.6 Å 127 …”
Section: Role Of the Morphology Of Sulfonic Resin Catalysts In The Et...mentioning
confidence: 99%