“…In recent years, nanobodies derived from the heavy chain antibodies of camelids and cartilaginous fish have emerged as a subject of increasing interest in the realm of immunoassays. − Compared with conventional IgG antibodies, nanobodies, which have determine genetic code, exhibit unique advantages, such as great antigenicity toward cryptic epitope, high thermostability, simple expression system, and ease of genetic engineering, and facilitate the construction of immunoassays. − At present, nanobody-based immunoassays have found extensive application in diverse analytical domains, including the analysis of mycotoxins, − pesticide residues, foodborne pathogens, , environmental pollutants, , and cancer markers. , However, their diminutive size poses a challenge as passive adsorption of nanobodies onto physical surfaces in a random manner can significantly compromise their binding function. This arises from the fact that their binding interface constitutes a relatively larger proportion of the total surface area, leading to concealed binding sites and a diminished signal-to-noise ratio, particularly when detecting large molecules like bacteria and proteins .…”