2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound absorption of porous materials – Accuracy of prediction methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The average error for all data was 4.85%. These error values are common for this type of empirical method, and the results are in agreement with the observations made recently by authors using empirical prediction methods to study typical mineral wools (Oliva and Hongisto 2013). Therefore, the calculated regression coefficients can be applied with sufficient confidence in the model to predict the acoustic behavior of this cellulose material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The average error for all data was 4.85%. These error values are common for this type of empirical method, and the results are in agreement with the observations made recently by authors using empirical prediction methods to study typical mineral wools (Oliva and Hongisto 2013). Therefore, the calculated regression coefficients can be applied with sufficient confidence in the model to predict the acoustic behavior of this cellulose material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although at first sight the sound absorption values of the cellulose material appear similar to those obtained for mineral wools of the same thickness, the values of the regression coefficients in the model are very different for both materials, as shown in Table 1. To quantitatively describe how much the empirical model either overestimated or underestimated the measured sound absorption coefficients, the relative prediction error was calculated using the following equation (Oliva and Hongisto 2013),…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23 When simulating a complex system, like the one used in this study, there are a lot of other influences on acoustic attenuation, such as impedance of the wall, termination of the pipe, etc. Therefore, in this study, anechoic termination was modeled using the sound absorption of porous material, 24 obtained with the Delany-Bazley model. Pipe walls were modeled with impedance boundary condition.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%