Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-22628-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound Detection Mechanisms and Capabilities of Teleost Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
0
5

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
1
175
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of these sounds is often facilitated by mechanical transduction mechanisms between the ear and anatomical structures with a different density from water; one of the most common auditory specializations for sensitivity to higher sound frequencies in fishes involves modifications of the swimbladder (e.g. Braun and Grande, 2008;Popper et al, 2003). From the dissections of B. trispinosus, the anterior end of the swimbladder is angled dorsally, pointing towards the neurocranium, and terminates 1.25 mm behind the sacculus (measured in one specimen).…”
Section: Pco2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of these sounds is often facilitated by mechanical transduction mechanisms between the ear and anatomical structures with a different density from water; one of the most common auditory specializations for sensitivity to higher sound frequencies in fishes involves modifications of the swimbladder (e.g. Braun and Grande, 2008;Popper et al, 2003). From the dissections of B. trispinosus, the anterior end of the swimbladder is angled dorsally, pointing towards the neurocranium, and terminates 1.25 mm behind the sacculus (measured in one specimen).…”
Section: Pco2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many marine organisms rely heavily on acoustics to survive. Fish, for instance, engage with their surroundings through sound, by using species-specific acoustic adaptations for hunting, territorial behaviour, mate attraction, spatial orientation, predator aversion, etc (Popper et al, 2003). Such ecologically important behaviours can be negatively influenced by anthropogenic noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited information is available on the hearing sensitivity of only about 100 of the 27,000 marine fish species (Popper et al, 2003). Most audiograms of marine fish species indicate that their highest sensitivity to sounds falls within the 0.1 -2 kHz range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound travels fast through water (Urick, 1983) and is capable of conveying significant information over long distances. Many marine organisms make sounds: marine mammals (Erbe, 2012;Richardson et al, 1995;Southall et al, 2007;Tyack & Clark, 2000), fish (Bass & Ladic, 2008;Popper et al, 2003;Hawinks & Myrberg, 1983;Myrberg, 1978Myrberg, , 1980Tavolga, 1971) and invertebrates (Buscaino et al, 2011;Popper et al, 2001). These organisms reveal their presence and behavioral dynamics through acoustic signals that can be easily detected, recorded, saved, and analysed.…”
Section: The Application Of Soundscape Ecology To Protect the Meditermentioning
confidence: 99%