1999
DOI: 10.1134/1.1130996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound propagation anomalies and phase diagram of chromium alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We ignore anisotropies here since we will do the calculation for a spin 1 2 system. We define retarded Green's functions [20,21]…”
Section: The Starting Spin Hamiltonian Iŝmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We ignore anisotropies here since we will do the calculation for a spin 1 2 system. We define retarded Green's functions [20,21]…”
Section: The Starting Spin Hamiltonian Iŝmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early theories that calculated the effect of magnetoelectric (ME) coupling on the spontaneous magnetization M and electric polarization P in so-called multiferroic materials used a Landau free energy formalism [1,2,3]. All terms in the free energy are written as products of the order parameters M and P and must satisfy the symmetry of the paraphase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 The highest possible coercivity is achieved when antiphase boundaries are planar, and domain wall segments are parallel to them. 49 The antiphase boundaries in CoPt-type magnets often have a preferential crystallographic orientation, which is clear from theoretical considerations, 44 and observed experimentally for CoPt. 39 Typically they slant towards the tetragonal axis, contrary to the domain wall segments which slant away from the tetragonal axis at A c < A ab and d ≪ l cr .…”
Section: Slanting and 'Smart Pinning' Of Domain Walls In Copt-typmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If pinning is generated by planar faults like APB's, the maximum unpinning threshold H u is achieved when DW segments (DWS) are parallel to the faults. If the planar fault is represented micromagnetically as a slab of thickness w ≪ δ with modified exchange and anisotropy constants A ′ and K ′ , then H u is given by 17 :…”
Section: Atomistic Scale: Pinning At Antiphase Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with α = π/3 3/2 ≃ 0.60 (our definition of δ contains an extra factor π compared to the notation of Ref. 17). Positive or negative H u corresponds to DW attraction to or repulsion from the fault.…”
Section: Atomistic Scale: Pinning At Antiphase Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%