2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sour mixed-gas upper bounds of glassy polymeric membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the performance of the poly­(imide–oxadiazole) membranes in this work were plotted against the 2021 sweet mixed-gas CO 2 permeability–CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity upper bound including previously published data from our laboratory and other data reported in the literature . The outcome of this comparison is illustrated in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the performance of the poly­(imide–oxadiazole) membranes in this work were plotted against the 2021 sweet mixed-gas CO 2 permeability–CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity upper bound including previously published data from our laboratory and other data reported in the literature . The outcome of this comparison is illustrated in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the sweet mixed-gas separation properties of poly­(imide–oxadiazole)­s containing (a) Durene:oxadiazol = 1:1, (b) Durene:oxadiazol = 3:1, and (c) CO 2 permeability–CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity relationship chart depicting the sweet mixed-gas permeation performance of poly­(imide–oxadiazole) membranes compared to those of previously reported materials. Literature data and upper bound ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worthy to mention that, in all cases, the mixed-gas CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity coefficients were observed to be higher than the ideal CO 2 /CH 4 selectivities because of the increment in the CO 2 /CH 4 mixed-gas solubility−selectivity due to the competitive sorption between the different gas components. 62,63 To illustrate the important results obtained in this work, the sweet mixed-gas performance of the modified copolyimide membranes was plotted on the 2021 sweet mixed-gas upper bound 64 and compared to similar glassy polymeric membranes reported previously (Figure 5c). The overall performance of these membranes in considered very attractive, especially at such harsh testing conditions (quaternary gas mixture and high feed pressure), which indicates the advantageous potential of using these membranes in industrial applications for natural gas upgrading.…”
Section: Sweet Mixed-gas Separation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[58][59][60][61]68,69 Finally, the sour mixed-gas separation performance of the PI-1 and MPI-1 membranes was plotted on the H 2 S/CH 4 and CO 2 /CH 4 permeability−selectivity plots and compared to the 2021 sour mixed-gas H 2 S/CH 4 and CO 2 /CH 4 upper bounds of similar glassy polymeric membranes reported previously in literature (Figure 6d,e). 64 It is worth mentioning that most data in the literature are for membranes studied using ternary gas mixtures (H 2 S/CO 2 /CH 4 ), while the performance of the PI-1 and MPI-1 membranes were measured using a quinary gas mixture (H 2 S/CO 2 /CH 4 /N 2 /C 2 H 6 ), which renders the separation more complex.…”
Section: Sweet Mixed-gas Separation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%