1995
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01075-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast P50 amplitudes were larger in MCI than controls at both stimulus rates. The differences between the recovery functions of P50 and N100 in MCI may be due to different generator sites in auditory cortex (Liegeois-Chauvel et al, 1994;Onitsuka et al, 2000;Reite et al, 1988;Yoshiura et al, 1995) and/or to changes in connectivity specific to the N100 generator (Chao and Knight, 1998). There were no significant group effects for the P200 component, a result consistent with previous studies (Golob et al, 2001(Golob et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Rate Effects Of Long-latency Evoked Potentialssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast P50 amplitudes were larger in MCI than controls at both stimulus rates. The differences between the recovery functions of P50 and N100 in MCI may be due to different generator sites in auditory cortex (Liegeois-Chauvel et al, 1994;Onitsuka et al, 2000;Reite et al, 1988;Yoshiura et al, 1995) and/or to changes in connectivity specific to the N100 generator (Chao and Knight, 1998). There were no significant group effects for the P200 component, a result consistent with previous studies (Golob et al, 2001(Golob et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Rate Effects Of Long-latency Evoked Potentialssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…P50 amplitude increases in MCI are not specific to the use of an auditory discrimination task as P50 amplitudes are also increased relative to controls when passively listening to tones (Golob et al, 2001). P50 is thought to reflect neural activity in primary/secondary auditory cortex (Liegeois-Chauvel et al, 1994;Reite et al, 1988;Yoshiura et al, 1995) and the definition of large P50 amplitudes in MCI compared to controls may reflect group differences at auditory sensory cortex. It is well known that the amplitude of sensory cortical potentials is affected by rate of stimulation (Picton et al, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The P50 component has been shown to be generated by neurons located in primary/secondary auditory cortex (Reite et al, 1988;Woldorff et al, 1993;Liegeois-Chauvel et al, 1994;Yoshiura et al, 1995). Although pathological changes may be present within auditory cortex in MCI, neuropathological studies of Alzheimer's disease have shown that primary and secondary auditory cortices are typically spared until late in the disease process (Arnold et al, 1991).…”
Section: P50 and P300 Abnormalities In Mild Cognitive Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We succeeded in detecting auditory brainstem magnetic fields , middle latency auditory-evoked magnetic fields [Yoshiura et al, 1994[Yoshiura et al, , 1995, and extremely low frequency magnetic fields associated with short-term memory processes [Yoshida et al, 1995;Nakagawa et al, 1996Nakagawa et al, , 2004Nakagawa and Ueno, 1999;Gjini et al, 2005].…”
Section: Magnetoencephalography (Meg)mentioning
confidence: 99%