2015
DOI: 10.1177/0267658315618009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source(s) of syntactic cross-linguistic influence (CLI): The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazandarani–Persian bilinguals

Abstract: This study investigates the role of previously acquired linguistic systems, Mazandarani and Persian, in the acquisition of third language (L3) English at the initial stages. The data have been obtained from 31 students (age 13–14 years), testing the placement of attributive possessives in a grammaticality judgment task, an element rearrangement task and an elicited oral imitation task. The participants consist of three groups: The first two groups have Mazandarani as the first language (L1) and Persian as the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, I briefly discuss the results of another study that examined crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of attributive possessives in L3 English by three bilingual Mazandarani–Persian groups: Fallah, Jabbari, and Fazilatfar (2016). All the participants were 13- to 14-year-old males, Mazandarani was the native language for two of the groups, and they had acquired L2 Persian to near-native-like levels, according to self-reports, starting at the age of seven.…”
Section: The Scalpel Model Of Third Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, I briefly discuss the results of another study that examined crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of attributive possessives in L3 English by three bilingual Mazandarani–Persian groups: Fallah, Jabbari, and Fazilatfar (2016). All the participants were 13- to 14-year-old males, Mazandarani was the native language for two of the groups, and they had acquired L2 Persian to near-native-like levels, according to self-reports, starting at the age of seven.…”
Section: The Scalpel Model Of Third Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors are careful to make the use versus dominance distinction, arguing that the first two groups are completely bilingual in Persian and Mazandarani, the only difference between them being time/percentage of communicative usage of one or the other language. Thus, Fallah et al (2016) is another study contributing some evidence both against wholesale typology-based transfer and against facilitative transfer only.…”
Section: The Scalpel Model Of Third Language Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilingual transfer is, therefore, unique as it embodies multidirectional interaction of three language systems (Cenoz, 2001;Clyne, 1997;Herdina & Jessner, 2002;Sanz et al, 2015). Recent developments in this area have led to the proliferation of studies that favor multilingual acquisition in adulthood with an increased interest in morphology and syntax (for further discussion, see Antonova-Ünlü & Sağın-Şimşek, 2015; Bardel & Falk, 2007;Flynn et al, 2004;García-Mayo & Slabakova, 2012;Sereno & Jongman, 1997) and with a lack of research on phonology (Fallah et al, 2016;Jaensch, 2011). Besides, previous major works have relied heavily on Western language pairings (see Gut, 2010;Llama et al, 2010;Mayo & Slabakova, 2015;Mayr & Montanari, 2015;Missaglia, 2010;Rah, 2010;Sanchez, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntactic dissociability renders the process of transfer potentially probabilistic. It is likely to be actually probabilistic because individuals will use a given structure in the language that is the source of transfer more or less frequently and differential usage will affects its accessibility for transfer (see Fallah, Jabbari & Fazilatfar, 2016). Further, there is evidence of the mutual influence of one language on another including the syntactic level (see Kroll, Dussias, Bice & Perrotti, 2015 for an excellent review).…”
Section: Transfer As a Probabilistic Processmentioning
confidence: 99%