2009
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2009.2026500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Seeking for Two Nonholonomic Models of Fish Locomotion

Abstract: In this paper, we present a method of locomotion control for underwater vehicles that are propelled by a periodic deformation of the vehicle body, which is similar to the way a fish moves. We have developed control laws employing "extremum seeking" for two different "fish" models. The first model consists of three rigid body links and relies on a 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF) movement that propels the fish without relying on vortices. The second fish model uses a Joukowski airfoil that has only 1 DOF in its moveme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was later extended in Tan, Nesić, and Mareels (2006) to obtain a semi-global practical stability result, whose foundation exploits the ''two-time scale'' setting analyzed in Teel, Moreau, and Nesić (2003). In general, these methods of analysis have proven to be instrumental for the design of several different extremum seeking controllers during the last years, e.g., , Dürr, Stanković, Ebenbauer, and Johansson (2013), Ghods and Krstić (2012), Ghaffari, Krstić, and Nesić (2012), Haring, Wouw, and Nesić (2013), Mills and Krstić (2014), Moase and Manzie (2012), Nesić, Mohammadi, and Manzie (2013), Nesić, Tan, Moase, and Manzie (2010) and Poveda and Quijano (2015), with applications in ABS break control (Yu & Ozguner, 2002), formation flight optimization, (Binetti, Ariyur, Krstić, & Bernelli, 2003), learning in non-cooperative games (Frihauf, Krstić, & Başar, 2012;Kutadinata, Moase, & Manzie, 2015), dynamic resource allocation (Poveda & Quijano, 2012, robot source seeking (Cochran, Kanso, Kelly, Xiong, & Krstić, 2009), optimization of wind turbines (Ghaffari, Krstić, & Seshagiri, 2014), and human exercise machine control (Zhang, Dawson, Dixon, & Xian, 2006), for example. One of the main limitations of existing ESCs based on averaging and singular perturbation theory is that, in general, they cannot deal with the presence of hybrid dynamics during the seeking process, i.e., dynamics that exhibit characteristics typical of both continuous-time systems and discrete-time systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was later extended in Tan, Nesić, and Mareels (2006) to obtain a semi-global practical stability result, whose foundation exploits the ''two-time scale'' setting analyzed in Teel, Moreau, and Nesić (2003). In general, these methods of analysis have proven to be instrumental for the design of several different extremum seeking controllers during the last years, e.g., , Dürr, Stanković, Ebenbauer, and Johansson (2013), Ghods and Krstić (2012), Ghaffari, Krstić, and Nesić (2012), Haring, Wouw, and Nesić (2013), Mills and Krstić (2014), Moase and Manzie (2012), Nesić, Mohammadi, and Manzie (2013), Nesić, Tan, Moase, and Manzie (2010) and Poveda and Quijano (2015), with applications in ABS break control (Yu & Ozguner, 2002), formation flight optimization, (Binetti, Ariyur, Krstić, & Bernelli, 2003), learning in non-cooperative games (Frihauf, Krstić, & Başar, 2012;Kutadinata, Moase, & Manzie, 2015), dynamic resource allocation (Poveda & Quijano, 2012, robot source seeking (Cochran, Kanso, Kelly, Xiong, & Krstić, 2009), optimization of wind turbines (Ghaffari, Krstić, & Seshagiri, 2014), and human exercise machine control (Zhang, Dawson, Dixon, & Xian, 2006), for example. One of the main limitations of existing ESCs based on averaging and singular perturbation theory is that, in general, they cannot deal with the presence of hybrid dynamics during the seeking process, i.e., dynamics that exhibit characteristics typical of both continuous-time systems and discrete-time systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we have applied the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and substituted the bound (18). The remainder of the proof directly follows after noting u * (x) ≡ 0.…”
Section: Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many works have used the extremum seeking method, which performs non-model based gradient estimation, for a variety of applications, such as steering vehicles toward a source in GPS-denied environments [16], [17], [18], optimizing the control of HCCI engines [19] and nonisothermal continuously stirred tank reactors [20], reducing the impact velocity of an electromechanical valve actuator [21], and controlling Tokamak plasmas [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…траектория в пространстве позиционных переменных g (в нашем случае в E(2)). В теории управления замкнутые кривые в пространстве β, которые обеспечивают наиболее «удачные» элементарные движения (например, разворот на месте или почти поступательное движение в каком-то направлении) в пространстве g, принято называть гейтами (см., например, [8,10,11,16]). Найдя для конкретной задачи ряд удач-ных гейтов, можно из них конструировать более сложные движения, решая тем самым те или иные задачи управления и оптимизации [8].…”
Section: управление при помощи гейтовunclassified