“…Thus, the term bioaccessible Fe is used for water-soluble Fe in aerosols, which is more bioavailable than insoluble forms such as crystalline Fe oxides in soils. Compared to the lithogenic Fe, the anthropogenic and pyrogenic sources co-emit metals and acidic species (i.e., sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and nitrogen oxides), which enhance the acidity of particulate matter (PM) and bioaccessibility of aerosol Fe (i.e., the fraction of bioaccessible Fe in total aerosol Fe) by orders of magnitude. − Indeed, the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires could supply pyrogenic Fe with higher bioaccessibility than lithogenic Fe and trigger widespread phytoplankton growth in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions of the Southern Ocean. ,, Meanwhile, individual particle observations confirm that more than 65% of nanosized Fe-containing particles are internally mixed with sulfates and nitrates over eastern China . Thus, nanoparticulate Fe oxides in anthropogenic aerosols are substantially transformed into bioaccessible Fe under acidic conditions during the aerosol lifetime. ,, At the same time, inhalation of Fe and copper (Cu) in PM 2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in diameter) causes a variety of adverse health effects due to the formation of reactive oxygen species through the Fenton reaction .…”