1985
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/65.11.1666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Goniometric Error at the Elbow

Abstract: We assessed accuracy and potential sources of error in goniometry by using a photographic reference standard. Forty-six physical therapy students measured elbow positions using plastic or steel goniometers following three protocols: ALIGN, in which the investigator's elbow was splinted and bony landmarks were prelabeled; ASSIGN, in which the elbow remained splinted but labels were removed; and PROM, in which raters measured full passive flexion of the elbow. F ratios of variances indicated that alignment of go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, re-palpation of the bony landmarks and re-positioning of the goniometer between the extended and flexed positions are important in order to minimise measurement error. Both goniometer alignment and landmark identification have been shown to contribute to measurement error in previous studies [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, re-palpation of the bony landmarks and re-positioning of the goniometer between the extended and flexed positions are important in order to minimise measurement error. Both goniometer alignment and landmark identification have been shown to contribute to measurement error in previous studies [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Standard deviations for tendon stiffnesses and muscle moment arms were set to 25 and 20% of the nominal parameter values, respectively (Murray et al 2002;Zajac 1989). Standard deviations for joint angles were set to 4°, the accuracy with which joint posture can be measured with a goniometer (Fish and Wingate 1985;Grohmann 1983). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard deviation of the muscle moment arms was set to 20% of the nominal parameter values (Murray et al 2002). The standard deviation for the joint angles was set to 4°, the accuracy with which angles can be measured with a manual goniometer (Fish and Wingate 1985;Grohmann 1983). Sensitivity analyses were performed only for the first simulation experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%