1999
DOI: 10.1128/aem.65.1.150-155.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Listeria monocytogenes Contamination in a Cold-Smoked Rainbow Trout Processing Plant Detected by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Typing

Abstract: Sites of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in a cold-smoked rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) processing plant were detected by sampling the production line, environment, and fish at different production stages. Two lots were monitored. The frequency of raw fish samples containing L. monocytogenes was low. During processing, the frequency of fish contaminated with L. monocytogenes clearly rose after brining, and the most contaminated sites of the processing plant were the brining and postbrining areas. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
69
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The cells were harvested from 2 ml of TSB after overnight enrichment at room temperature. DNA isolation was performed according to Autio et al (1999) omitting mutanolysin from the lysis buffer. In this method, the plugs were lysed for only 3 h and a single 2-h wash with ESP was used.…”
Section: In Situ Dna Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were harvested from 2 ml of TSB after overnight enrichment at room temperature. DNA isolation was performed according to Autio et al (1999) omitting mutanolysin from the lysis buffer. In this method, the plugs were lysed for only 3 h and a single 2-h wash with ESP was used.…”
Section: In Situ Dna Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This colonization, as well as job rotation of staff among departments, have been identified as primary mechanisms for contamination of the final products in some processing lines. In most cases, the contamination of the final product is believed to have occurred during processing because the strains found in the incoming raw materials are different from the strains found in the final product (Autio et al 1999;Fonnesbech Vogel et al 2001a,b). In other cases, when the strains of L. monocytogenes contaminating the raw materials were indistinguishable from those isolated from the final product, the contaminated incoming raw materials are considered to be the source of continuing contamination (Lawrence and Gilmour 1995;Giovannacci et al 1999;Fonnesbech Vogel et al 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. monocytogenes isolated from cold-smoked fish of manufacturer A harboured two serovars (1/2a and 4b), each with unique Asc I profiles, implying that serotyping and genotyping of several isolates from each food sample is important (Loncarevic et al 1996;Ericsson et al 1997;Autio et al 1999;Dauphin et al 2001). Furthermore, products from the same manufacturer (A) purchased in both Germany and Sweden contained L. monocytogenes strains with the same Asc I and Apa I profiles, indicating a common source of contamination, which could be the raw fish, employees or the environment in the processing plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%