Sources of Sex Information Used by Young British Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW) and Women Who Have Sex Exclusively with Men (WSEM): Evidence from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles

Burkill, Sarah; Waterhouse, Philippa

doi:10.1007/s13178-018-0327-z

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Entre las chicas que se relacionan sexualmente con otras chicas la idea del cuidado parece neutralizarse ante la autopercepción de invulnerabilidad frente a ITS, por el hecho de no tener sexo con hombres (Castro Calvo et al, 2016;Dolan y Davis, 2003). En términos generales, se sabe poco sobre la transmisión de ITS entre mujeres (Soligo Takemoto et al, 2019) y, cada vez más, se hace evidente la ausencia y la necesidad de educación sexual no heteronormativa en la enseñanza secundaria (Burkill y Waterhouse, 2019). Por el contrario, las relaciones homosexuales entre hombres estuvieron hipervisibilizadas en campañas de prevención del VIH (Santoro, 2019), y entre ellos el preservativo se presenta a través del discurso legítimo como "la regla de oro" para el sexo anal con parejas ocasionales (Gómez-Bueno et al, 2021), aunque sus prácticas difieran.…”

Section: El Cuidado Y La Prevenciónunclassified

Sexo sin protección: contradicciones y lógicas de acción

Bueno¹,

González-Calo²,

Rodríguez-García-de-Cortázar³

2022

RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

¿Cuáles son los argumentos contrarios al uso del preservativo manejados por la población de 18 a 25 años residente en Granada? Para responder a esta pregunta se diseñó una investigación cualitativa mediante grupos de discusión. Fueron seis los grupos de discusión realizados, en ellos participaron treinta y nueve jóvenes, segmentados por nivel de estudios, género, orientación sexual y duración de su relación. Los objetivos del artículo son: analizar los imaginarios que condicionan el uso de protección frente a las infecciones de transmisión sexual (condones y barreras de látex) en las relaciones sexuales entre jóvenes de diferentes orientaciones sexuales y comprender las lógicas que contribuyen a dotarlas de sentido. El análisis de los discursos reveló prácticas de cuidados poco consistentes, dificultades para erotizar el uso del condón y ausencia de protección para el sexo entre mujeres. Se identificaron exigencias de género contradictorias y diferentes imaginarios del placer. Finamente, se desvelaron las lógicas de la confianza y del placer como reguladoras de la lógica preventiva del cuidado.

show abstract

Section: El Cuidado Y La Prevenciónunclassified

Sexo sin protección: contradicciones y lógicas de acción

Bueno¹,

González-Calo²,

Rodríguez-García-de-Cortázar³

2022

RES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Formal sexual education is considered “curriculum-based sex education programs, taught within school classrooms… [and] informal sexual education refers to other unstructured sources of sex information to which an individual might be exposed” (Lavie-Ajayi, 2020 , p. 486). These informal sources of sexual information include parents, peers, and media (Burkill & Waterhouse, 2019 ; Edwards, 2016 ) and are central in emerging adults’ internalization of sexual scripts. Specifically, interpersonal (e.g., parents, peers) and mediated (e.g., television content, movies, and social media) sources of sexual information heavily influence emerging adults’ sexual script internalization (Coyne et al, 2019 ; Wright et al, 2012 ) through a process of sexual socialization in which knowledge and values pertaining to sexual behavior are acquired.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Sexual Information Sources are Related to Emerging Adults’ Sex-Positive Scripts and Sexual Communication

White

Boehm

Glackin

et al. 2023

Sexuality & Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research suggests that parents, peers, and media are popular sources of sexual information and beliefs among emerging adults. Sex-positivity is an orientation toward sex that emphasizes open-minded beliefs and communication about varying sexual behaviors, preferences, and orientations. The current study investigated whether these sexual information sources were associated with emerging adults’ endorsement of sex-positive and sexual orientation-related sexual scripts, and if these sources and scripts were associated with sexual communication among a sample of college students ages 18–22 (n = 341). Results indicate that learning from television was positively related to sex-positive sexual script endorsement, and that sex-positive scripts were associated with more positive sexual communication. An interaction also emerged between gender and learning from television on sex-positive script endorsement, and between gender and learning from social media on sexual orientation-related script endorsement. The implications of these findings are contextualized within emerging adults’ sexual agency and behavior. Future directions of research are also discussed.

show abstract

“…This disengagement creates poor sexual health literacy and less safe sexual practice ( Estes, 2017 ; Grant & Nash, 2018 ; Hoefer & Hoefer, 2017 ) A Stonewall survey of LGBTQ young people in the UK found that although 60%–80% had been taught about contraception, safe sex, violence in relationships and consent, only 20% had been taught about these issues from a same-sex partners perspective ( Stonewall, 2017 ). This lack of formal RSE relevant to LGBTQ youth causes young people to source this information through their early sexual partners, which leaves them at risk of sexual exploitation and violence within their relationships ( Burkill & Waterhouse, 2019 ; Formby & Donovan, 2020 ; Hobaica & Kwon, 2017 ; UNESCO, 2018 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Rapid Review and Narrative Synthesis of the Consequences of Non-Inclusive Sex Education in UK Schools on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Young People

Epps

Markowski

2021

The Journal of School Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) in schools are predominantly heterocentric. Consequently, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning young people have reported feeling excluded. This exclusion results in feelings of being “different” and “other,” which in turn leads to further disengagement in the sex education classroom, contributing to poor sexual health literacy, greater risk of abusive relationships, and higher rates of sexually transmitted infections. A rapid review was undertaken to identify the impact of non-inclusive sex education. The review makes recommendations for policy and practice, which includes the provision of training courses to school teaching staff with an emphasis on inclusive RSE, appropriate online resources for lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) young people, as well as offering 1:1 emotional health support for LGBTQ young people as they begin to question their sexual orientation.

show abstract

Sources of Sex Information Used by Young British Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW) and Women Who Have Sex Exclusively with Men (WSEM): Evidence from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles

Cited by 10 publications

References 28 publications

Sexo sin protección: contradicciones y lógicas de acción

Sexo sin protección: contradicciones y lógicas de acción

How Sexual Information Sources are Related to Emerging Adults’ Sex-Positive Scripts and Sexual Communication

A Rapid Review and Narrative Synthesis of the Consequences of Non-Inclusive Sex Education in UK Schools on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Young People

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About