2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl089560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of the Intermodel Spread in Projected Global Monsoon Hydrological Sensitivity

Abstract: The projected monsoon hydrological sensitivity, namely, the precipitation change rate per kelvin of global warming, shows substantial intermodel spread among 40 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 models. The hydrological sensitivity of the Northern Hemisphere summer monsoon is negatively correlated with that of the Southern Hemisphere summer monsoon. The intermodel spread of the Northern Hemisphere summer monsoon hydrological sensitivity is mainly attributed to the projected interhemispheric tempera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These dynamic changes can be due to poleward shifts of the midlatitude jets or changes in stationary wave patterns, among other possibilities (Shaw, 2019;Shaw et al, 2016;Wills & Schneider, 2016). Furthermore, intermodel variability in projected drying/wettening is associated with intermodel variability in circulation changes especially on regional scales (Cao et al, 2020;Garfinkel et al, 2020;Shaw et al, 2016;Simpson et al, 2018Simpson et al, , 2016Zappa et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dynamic changes can be due to poleward shifts of the midlatitude jets or changes in stationary wave patterns, among other possibilities (Shaw, 2019;Shaw et al, 2016;Wills & Schneider, 2016). Furthermore, intermodel variability in projected drying/wettening is associated with intermodel variability in circulation changes especially on regional scales (Cao et al, 2020;Garfinkel et al, 2020;Shaw et al, 2016;Simpson et al, 2018Simpson et al, , 2016Zappa et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that the CMIP6 model can well reproduce the negative monsoon precipitation sensitivity during the historical warming period (1850–2014). This contradicts the future projection result that gives a positive value of ∼2% K −1 (Cao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). The individual forcing experiment shows that the historical GHG forced a rate of ∼2.1% K −1 ; however, the AA causes a rate of ∼11% K −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Note that all indices are scaled by the GMST change from hist‐aer and hist‐GHG experiments, respectively. As suggested by previous studies, two thermal indices are used to represent the heterogeneous global warming that has dominant effects on monsoon circulation changes (Cao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2013, 2020). The ITD index is defined as the surface temperature difference between the NH [0–40°N, 0°–360°] and SH [0°–60°S, 0°–360°].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These thermodynamic and dynamic factors are important not just for the multimodel mean response, but also have been associated with intermodel variability in projected drying/wettening. Specifically, a larger increase in mean temperature due to a larger climate sensitivity in a given model would imply a stronger thermodynamic effect, while intermodel variability in circulation changes are associated with uncertainty in regional precipitation (Zappa et al, 2015;Simpson et al, 2016Simpson et al, , 2018Garfinkel et al, 2020;Cao et al, 2020). An example of a region with a wide spread in model projections is the Eastern Mediterannean: CMIP models project a decrease of 20-30% of Mediterranean precipitation by the end of the 21st century as compared to present-day averages if the multi-model mean is computed (Giorgi & Lionello, 2008;Kelley et al, 2012;Polade et al, 2017;Tuel & Eltahir, 2020;Garfinkel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%