2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of variation in fibre production and quality traits source of variation in down-bearing Patagonian goats and implications for developing a cashmere industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar dehairing yield of 32.5 (sd: 13.9) % was obtained in a recent population work with fibre from the same origin (Figure 1). 4 The lowest FL is obtained on the run 7 (2.6cm), but in the run 4 the average length is still 3.5cm, close to the industrial optimum which is 3.8cm. With Iranian shearing cashmere a mean fibre length has decreased from 59.8mm (at raw state) to 46.1mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar dehairing yield of 32.5 (sd: 13.9) % was obtained in a recent population work with fibre from the same origin (Figure 1). 4 The lowest FL is obtained on the run 7 (2.6cm), but in the run 4 the average length is still 3.5cm, close to the industrial optimum which is 3.8cm. With Iranian shearing cashmere a mean fibre length has decreased from 59.8mm (at raw state) to 46.1mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…3 This is even more difficult, considering that in the case of Argentina, the raw material to be dehaired comes from a sheared fleece, that is, not combed on the goat. 4 In the process of mechanical dehairing of Kazakhstan goat down, the average length of true coarse fibers decreased with each pass and the overall decline was 10.5mm or 25.5%, from the sixth to the eighth-from 36.6 to 32.4mm and thus the short lower level was reached. During processing the average fibers fineness decreased 1.19micrometers or 7.28%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The types of cover or types of fleece have been identified in various species and breeds [1] and described in various works in cashmere-producing criollo goats [2], in alpacas [3] and in argentine Llamas [4,5]. The types of fleeces are made up of different types of fibers and at different frequencies within fiber types, in Llamas of Argentina [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in Argentina, the goat fiber of Angora (Mohair) is widely known, the same information on the production of fiber from the double coated Creole "hairy"goat of northern Patagonia, which could be generically be referred as Cashemere and other names such as Cashgora [1] is not available. However, the name Cashmere results from an arbitrary textile definition and does not correspond to a biological-productive base, although Australian studies confirm that the diameter of cashmere ranges from 13.6 to 19.2µm and cashgora from 17.8 to 22.7µm [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of this study, the quality of fiber produced by these populations and its possible industrialization in the Country was established. The presence of different types of fleeces (long Cashemere, short Cashemere, Intermediate Cashmere, Cashgora and Mohair) was determined as well as degrees of fineness according to different classification criteria and also fiber lengths [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%