“…Plant water status during leaf development, and/or the amount of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) absorbed by the leaf during its formation have been identified as important factors influencing the SLA of adult leaves (Le Roux et al, 1999;Niinemets, 2007). Specific leaf area is generally known to decrease from the bottom of the canopy to its top (Le Roux et al, 1999;Marshall and Monserud, 2003;Sellin and Kupper, 2006;Weiskittel et al, 2008;Davi et al, 2008;Cavaleri Forest Ecology and Management 259 (2010) [1796][1797][1798][1799][1800][1801][1802][1803][1804][1805][1806][1807] et al, submitted for publication), or from the interior of individual tree crowns to their periphery (Han et al, 2003;Sellin and Kupper, 2006;Weiskittel et al, 2008), and these variations are considered either as an adaptation to a varying light environment within the canopy (e.g., Niinemets, 1997;Kenzo et al, 2006;White and Scott, 2006), allowing optimization of carbon gains (e.g., Rambal et al, 1996;Meir et al, 2002), or as a result of increased leaf water stress (decreased leaf water potential) with height or branch length, due to gravity or path length resistance (Koch et al, 2004;Woodruff et al, 2004;Ryan et al, 2006;He et al, 2008;Du et al, 2008). Height-related variation in SLA is commonly described by exponential functions relating SLA or LMA to the cumulative leaf area index (from the top of the canopy to its bottom), similar to the functions used to model light attenuation inside forest canopies (Rambal et al, 1996;Davi et al, 2008), or by exponential functions relating SLA ...…”