South Africa After Apartheid: The First Decade

Abstract

South Africa celebrated ten years of democracy in April 2004 with a third round of national elections. The African National Congress — led by Nelson Mandela's successor, Thabo Mbeki — won another overwhelming victory. The country's transition will be remembered for the surprising ease with which seemingly intractable conflict was subjected to the routine functioning of democratic institutions. This essay analyzes South Africa's first decade of democracy — covering themes of electoral politics and administration, and government responsiveness and accountability. Perhaps paradoxically, the emergence of a single-party dominant regime has coincided with the institutional strengthening of political contestation and constitutional government. Implications for democratic consolidation and developmental governance are discussed.

More on the Seasonal Determinants of Turnout: Holidays and French Presidential Elections

“…But declaring Election Day as a public holiday may be dangerous if the Election Day is close to the weekend. Indeed, people can take an extended weekend that leads to a weak turnout as it was apparently the case in South Africa (Alence, 2004;Piombo, 2004).…”

Scientists as lobbyists? How science can make its voice heard in the South African policy‐making arena

“…The Cabinet and the President are key players in setting the policy agenda, initiating and, through the public service, implementing policy. As Alence () put it, Parliament is not the main venue for trying to influence major policy issues the country is facing; it is the executive that makes the main decisions here. The executive should thus be targeted by those aiming to influence the policy agenda.…”

“…The judiciary in South Africa, and in the last instance the Constitutional Court, can review legislation and executive decisions and declare them invalid if they are judged to be unconstitutional (Mathisen and Tjonneland, ; SA Yearbook, ). As a result of the rather weak separation of power between the executive and legislative branches of the government, South Africa's judiciary is very important for the prospects of accountable governance (Alence, ).…”

“…A well‐known example is the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC), which campaigned for access to lower‐cost acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) drugs by opposing the international pharmaceutical industry and opposing the South African government by demanding a comprehensive treatment campaign. This was achieved by confrontational mass action, Constitutional Court challenges of the government's AIDS policy and participation in official policy consultation (Alence, ).…”

“…The higher up on the party list a candidate is, the better is his/her chance of acquiring and keeping a seat in Parliament. This reality makes it necessary for candidates to impress the party leadership and not the electorate (Alence, ), which in turn means that parliamentarians tow the executive line by voting uniformly as a party (Mattes, ; Sadie, ). This system can lead to a serious lack of accountability and contact between MPs and their constituencies (Sadie, ), as is regularly demonstrated in South Africa.…”