2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

South-South humanitarianism: The case of Covid-organics in Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To echo Ngam (2020, p. 6), the cure's “growing popularity outside Madagascar [probably had] nothing to do with the product's medicinal value”; it was embraced largely because it became “a source of pride”—“Africa's contribution to the treatments being developed around the world.” This can explain the flurry of congratulations from numerous African leaders (and the orders placed by their respective countries) after Rajoelina announced the cure's creation, even as academic quarters raised their doubts. Writing specifically about the Tanzanian experience, Richey et al (2021) framed this ‘unscientific’, multi-country acceptance of Covid-Organics as a continuation of ‘South-South humanitarianism’: The cure, in this case, was but part of the ongoing narrative of ‘marginalized’ and ‘neglected’ Global South countries ostensibly turning to each other for help amid continuing colonialism from the Global North, which had historically exploited and oppressed the African people. All these pan-African sentiments that emerged in this “climate of deep distrust of Western medical science” ( Nordling, 2020 ) were then magnified and reinforced by local media, which also helped fuel resentment against the cure's critics (e.g.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To echo Ngam (2020, p. 6), the cure's “growing popularity outside Madagascar [probably had] nothing to do with the product's medicinal value”; it was embraced largely because it became “a source of pride”—“Africa's contribution to the treatments being developed around the world.” This can explain the flurry of congratulations from numerous African leaders (and the orders placed by their respective countries) after Rajoelina announced the cure's creation, even as academic quarters raised their doubts. Writing specifically about the Tanzanian experience, Richey et al (2021) framed this ‘unscientific’, multi-country acceptance of Covid-Organics as a continuation of ‘South-South humanitarianism’: The cure, in this case, was but part of the ongoing narrative of ‘marginalized’ and ‘neglected’ Global South countries ostensibly turning to each other for help amid continuing colonialism from the Global North, which had historically exploited and oppressed the African people. All these pan-African sentiments that emerged in this “climate of deep distrust of Western medical science” ( Nordling, 2020 ) were then magnified and reinforced by local media, which also helped fuel resentment against the cure's critics (e.g.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misinformation surrounding COVID-19 has led to confusion, lack of consensus, and a failure to take the severity of the coronavirus pandemic as seriously as it should have been by the general public [ 5 ]. For instance, misinformation circulated heavily in social media [ 6 ] and, with not enough resources available to label all misinformation as false, or unverified, herbal remedies started providing a false sense of security to the public [ 7 ]. Instead of focusing on actual preventive measures such as social distancing, wearing face masks, and regularly washing hands with soap or sanitising with 70% isopropyl alcohol [ 8 ], focusing on alternative solutions not only hinders progress in medical science but also poses significant health risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In asserting control and direction over their lives, in order to safeguard their social structures, Africans have utilized knowledge, practices, skills and tools that their societies have developed in the course of years and centuries (Richey et al, 2021;Rugumamu, 2003). As observed by Vandebroek et al (2011), indigenous knowledge is the sum of experience and knowledge within a given group in a specific geographical location, which forms the basis for decisionmaking related to familiar and unfamiliar problems and challenges.…”
Section: Reconceptualising Indigenous Knowledge Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are beginning to realize that IKS is the largest single resource not yet mobilized for development. It is a powerful asset that many developing countries possess (Richey et al, 2021;Newsham & Thomas, 2011). Therefore, in this study, IKS refers to the knowledge possessed by indigenous people and practised over centuries in land resources utilization and management for the efficient use of the Earth's natural resources, to sustain individual and community livelihoods.…”
Section: Reconceptualising Indigenous Knowledge Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%