2002
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southeast Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C: The impact of novel genotypes and race on treatment outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
80
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
10
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of HCV genotype 6 in our patients with core sequencing HCV genotype testing was 41% and similar to that of HCV genotype 1 (42%). In contrast, in our subset of 122 patients who had HCV genotype testing done with the INNO-LiPA assay, the prevalence of HCV genotype 6 was much lower (15%) and the total prevalence of HCV genotype 1 was 71%, consistent with previous studies that reported mistyping of HCV genotype 6 as genotype 1 by the INNOLiPA assay [18,22,23]. Our study, however, was not intended to directly address the discordance rate of HCV genotyping between the core sequencing and the INNO-LiPA test, as this has been previously described [18], but rather to describe the prevalence of the different genotypes in SEA patients with CHC by using the gold standard method, which is the core sequencing test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of HCV genotype 6 in our patients with core sequencing HCV genotype testing was 41% and similar to that of HCV genotype 1 (42%). In contrast, in our subset of 122 patients who had HCV genotype testing done with the INNO-LiPA assay, the prevalence of HCV genotype 6 was much lower (15%) and the total prevalence of HCV genotype 1 was 71%, consistent with previous studies that reported mistyping of HCV genotype 6 as genotype 1 by the INNOLiPA assay [18,22,23]. Our study, however, was not intended to directly address the discordance rate of HCV genotyping between the core sequencing and the INNO-LiPA test, as this has been previously described [18], but rather to describe the prevalence of the different genotypes in SEA patients with CHC by using the gold standard method, which is the core sequencing test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast, in our subset of 122 patients who had HCV genotype testing done with the INNO-LiPA assay, the prevalence of HCV genotype 6 was much lower (15%) and the total prevalence of HCV genotype 1 was 71%, consistent with previous studies that reported mistyping of HCV genotype 6 as genotype 1 by the INNOLiPA assay [18,22,23]. Our study, however, was not intended to directly address the discordance rate of HCV genotyping between the core sequencing and the INNO-LiPA test, as this has been previously described [18], but rather to describe the prevalence of the different genotypes in SEA patients with CHC by using the gold standard method, which is the core sequencing test. Accurate HCV genotyping is important, as HCV genotypes have been known to be among the most important predictors for treatment outcomes to standard peginterferon and ribavirin therapy, at least for patients with genotypes 1 and 2/3 [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas HCV genotypes 2 and 3 are responsive to the therapy in 70-80% of cases, genotypes 1 and 4 are considered to be difficult to eradicate with sustained virological response (SVR) rates around 50% (4,5,21). The SVR rate for genotype-6 infection is higher than that seen in genotype 1 infection but lower than that of genotypes 2 and 3 (22)(23)(24). Due to these facts, determining HCV genotype prior to considering a specific therapy protocol is of utmost importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%