Southern sustainability initiatives in agricultural value chains: a question of enhanced inclusiveness? The case of Trustea in India

Abstract

Recent studies have shed light on the emergence of Southern sustainability initiatives in commodity-based value chains. These initiatives position themselves as countering the exclusionary nature of many global multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), as critically analysed by previous studies. However, a common theoretical perspective on the inclusiveness of MSIs is still lacking. By drawing on the theory of regimes of engagement, we develop a theoretical framework which helps understanding the overt and subtle practices of including or excluding different stakeholders in MSIs. We apply this framework to ‘Trustea’, an Indian MSI for sustainable tea production, to further investigate the ‘inclusiveness paradigm’ of Southern sustainability initiatives. Our findings highlight the complexity of stakeholder engagement across the different phases of Trustea’s development, from initiation and code development to formal launch and roll-out. We find that different types of engagement can exist in parallel. Justifiable engagement is expressed in the participating organisations’ reference to a shared common goal of Trustea, whereas familiar engagement is linked to the rootedness of the individuals involved in the Indian tea industry. Strategic engagement, in turn, comes to the fore through the strong emphasis on developing an Indian code for sustainable tea production and promoting adoption among tea growers. The importance of reaching this objective has led to the replication of exclusionary patterns also noted for global MSIs, as small-scale producers and other weak actors have been largely excluded from decision-making processes, despite informal efforts aimed at substitution of representation.

Building Legitimacy in an Era of Polycentric Trade: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance

“…Our approach advances the sub-field of transnational sustainability governance studies because such studies have not yet taken more significant stock of the implications of polycentric trade for legitimation politics within newly emerging governance arrangements (cf. Bitzer & Marazzi, 2021).…”

“…We know from previous literature in transnational standard-setting that input legitimacy has been a central concern in awarding or rejecting support to standards by particular societal stakeholders (Fransen, 2012) and that this has informed important contestation among businesses and NGOs, as well as among various standard initiatives. It has also received increased attention in studies of Southern standards (Bitzer & Marazzi, 2021), although these studies scarcely deal with the politics of legitimation that underlie institutional design decisions made. Similarly, output legitimacy in terms of policies produced by MSIs also receives significant attention as it describes the activities and priorities of these organisations, albeit with more attention for the legitimacy aspects of these in studies that do not deal with Southern standards (cf.…”

A Systematic Comparative Assessment of Certification Standards in India and Suggested Evaluation Frameworks

“…A comparative gray analysis conducted by Ikram et al (2020) reveal that the adoption of Quality, Environment, and Social (QES) standards have a positive and significant effect on exports of goods and services in developing countries. However, substantial heterogeneity exists, which is only partly attributable to observed factors that vary across studies [such as the type of product, standard, or region (Meemken, 2020;Bitzer and Marazzi, 2021)] analyzed the inclusiveness small-scale producers and other weak actors in Trustea, as an example of Southern sustainability initiatives, a global multi-stakeholder initiatives.…”