2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sovereign debt risk in emerging market economies: Does inflation targeting adoption make any difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indicate that high inflation volatility decreases the likelihood to adopt inflation targeting. 19 This result is in line with studies by Lucotte (2012), Minea and Tapsoba (2014), Ebeke and Fouejieu (2015) and Balima, Combes, and Minea (2017) among others, who show that high or volatile inflation is negatively associated with the probability of adopting IT. GDP share and trade openness is also found to negatively affect IT adoption.…”
Section: The Propensity Score For Inflation Targetingsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…indicate that high inflation volatility decreases the likelihood to adopt inflation targeting. 19 This result is in line with studies by Lucotte (2012), Minea and Tapsoba (2014), Ebeke and Fouejieu (2015) and Balima, Combes, and Minea (2017) among others, who show that high or volatile inflation is negatively associated with the probability of adopting IT. GDP share and trade openness is also found to negatively affect IT adoption.…”
Section: The Propensity Score For Inflation Targetingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We consider a sample of 48 advanced and emerging economies that have and have not adopted explicit IT between 1982 and 2016: Argentina, Australia*, Austria, Belgium, Brazil*,Canada*, Chile*, Colombia*, Costa Rica, Denmark, Finland*, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, China, Hungary*, India, Indonesia*, Ireland, Israel*, Italy, Japan, Korea*, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico*, Netherlands, New Zealand*, Norway*, Peru*, Philippines*, Poland*, Portugal, Romania*, Russia, Singapore, Slovak Republic*, Slovenia, South Africa*, Spain*, Sweden*, Switzerland*, Thailand*, Turkey*, The United Kingdom* and The United States. 10 Following Rose (2007), Minea and Tapsoba (2014) and Balima, Combes, and Minea (2017) we classify an observation as IT distinguishing between Full-fledge (FF henceforth) and Soft starting dates of IT. The difference between the two dates captures the fact that some central banks first adopted "soft or informal" IT (see Vega and Winkelried (2005)), in which the central bank's reaction, following a deviation of inflation from its targeted level, is slower compared to its reaction under an explicit "full-fledged or formal" IT.…”
Section: Data and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mishkin (2004) or Hammond (2012), a central bank has an IT framework if it fullfills the five following criteria : 1) Price stability is explicitly recognized as the main goal of monetary policy; 2) There is a public announcement of a quantitative target for inflation; 3) Monetary policy is based on a wide set of information, including an inflation forecast; 4) Transparency; and 5) Accountability mechanisms. For the sake of robustness, we follow Rose (2007), Minea and Tapsoba (2014) and Balima, Combes, and Minea (2017) and distinguished between Full-fledge (FF from now on) and Soft starting dates of IT. The difference between the two dates captures the fact that some central banks first adopted "soft or informal" IT (see Vega and Winkelried (2005)), in which the central bank's reaction, following a deviation of inflation from its targeted level, is slower compared to its reaction under an explicit "full-fledged or formal" IT.…”
Section: Data and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given country i we have a i = β + i − β − i . It can easily be shown that the average treatment effect of IT on the pass-through asymmetry is equal to the difference between the ATT when oil price increases and the ATT when 11 For the sake of robustness, we estimate the average treatment effect for the "Soft IT" classification adoption date and we add variables related to the structure of the economy, the financial sector or the fiscal position of the country while computing the PS index (see Balima, Combes, and Minea (2017)). The estimated ATT in both cases are similar to the baseline estimation.…”
Section: Average Treatment Effect Of Inflation Targeting On the Pass-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Minea and Tapsoba (2014), and Balima et al (2017), we consider the nearest (N = 1), the two-nearest (N = 2), and the three-nearest (N = 3). The second method is the radius or caliper matching (Dehejia and Wahba, 2002), which matches each treated i with untreated j that falls within radius r. We use the PS to define a medium (r = 0.1), a small (r = 0.05) and a wide (r = 0.2) radius.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%