2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sovereign wealth fund investment and the return-to-risk performance of target firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As SWFs are under the full control of governments, their target firms are at least partially governmentowned as well (Knill, Lee & Mauck 2012). This strand of literature suggests that governments usually have a negative impact on firm financial performance, which improves with privatization (Estrin, Hanousek, Kočenda & "e-Finanse" 2017, vol.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As SWFs are under the full control of governments, their target firms are at least partially governmentowned as well (Knill, Lee & Mauck 2012). This strand of literature suggests that governments usually have a negative impact on firm financial performance, which improves with privatization (Estrin, Hanousek, Kočenda & "e-Finanse" 2017, vol.…”
Section: Background and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of preferences for target characteristics, the effects on target performance of SWFs are similar to passive institutional investors. Knill et al (2012) have investigated the relationship between Sovereign Wealth Funds' investment and the return-torisk performance of target firms. They have found evidence that target firms' raw returns declined after the investment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though 40 percent of the CNSSF assets are invested in risky assets, Bortolotti et al (2015) assume the CNSSF is a pension fund and excludes it from the sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) list. However, the CNSSF does not recognise any liabilities to beneficiaries, leading Knill et al (2012) to treat the CNSSF as a SWF.…”
Section: General Background and Motivation For Studying The Cnssfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, contrasting the existing literature, that tests if state-sponsored investors can earn abnormal returns (see, Knill et al, 2012;Kotter and Lel, 2011;Bortolotti et al, 2015), we offer new analysis that explores if a state sponsored investor can play a 'last resort' role in the stock markets, analogous to role that central banks play in banking systems. We also check the relation between liquidity provision behavior and information quality.…”
Section: Paper 1: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation