1988
DOI: 10.2307/1148614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet Union: A Civil Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have elsewhere documented the unexpectedly high level of support for a host of democratic values among ordinary Soviet citizens (e.g., Gibson and Duch 1993a;Gibson, Duch, and Tedin 1992), and some long-time observers of Soviet political culture agree (e.g., Starr 1988). At the same time, we do not perceive democratization in the USSR as necessarily emanating from demands from the mass public.…”
Section: Democratization In the Ussrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have elsewhere documented the unexpectedly high level of support for a host of democratic values among ordinary Soviet citizens (e.g., Gibson and Duch 1993a;Gibson, Duch, and Tedin 1992), and some long-time observers of Soviet political culture agree (e.g., Starr 1988). At the same time, we do not perceive democratization in the USSR as necessarily emanating from demands from the mass public.…”
Section: Democratization In the Ussrmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prior to the introduction of Mikhail Gorbachev's programme of perestroika, the communist regime had fiercely guarded its monopoly control over the public realm, extinguishing all opportunity for politically meaningful freedom of speech and association. With Gorbachev's commitment to reforming the system came new opportunities and spaces for independent speech and activism [Lapidus, 1989;Starr, 1988]. As part of the unraveling of communist control over Soviet society, it is not surprising that the social movements that emerged during the 1985-91 period differed somewhat from their western counterparts [Smith, 1996;Fish, 1991;Dawson, 1993].…”
Section: The Threat To Domestic Stability: Lessons From the Soviet Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fred Starr, for example, claims that urbanization, the dispersion of professional skill, the penetration of a variety of communications technologies {that enable people to associate as autonomous and equal individuals), and the enormous evasion of state structures (through informal mechanisms of economic coordination and cultural expression) had already established the outlines of a civil society. Reform under Gorbachev has meant no more than clearing away the bureaucratic impediments to a liberal society (Starr, 1988(Starr, , 1989. Moshe Lewin (1988) reinforced that view by highlighting the informal but sturdy milieux both within and outside official structures that sustained independent public opinion and behavior.…”
Section: Social Change and Political Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Starr (1989) and Mickiewicz (1988), new communications technologies facilitate links among individuals and groups that subvert the regime's controls over the dissemination of information. That much said, however, it is still necessary to inquire into the role of new communications links (newspapers, journals, news services, broadcast organizations, publishing houses, newsletters, private schools, etc.)…”
Section: Communications As a Factormentioning
confidence: 99%