Sustainable Protein Sources 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802778-3.00002-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soy Protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing with other protein-rich products, both TM protein extracts have eco-efficiency scores comparable to that of the lupin seed protein isolate and lower than that of other vegetable protein sources (Faba bean protein ingredient as well as microbial protein and soy protein isolate). The large error bars for microbial protein and soy protein isolate indicate the variations in eco-efficiency scores for these two protein sources, which are due to different production contexts . Indeed, the results for the soy protein isolate were obtained from 10 different studies, resulting in different GWP scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing with other protein-rich products, both TM protein extracts have eco-efficiency scores comparable to that of the lupin seed protein isolate and lower than that of other vegetable protein sources (Faba bean protein ingredient as well as microbial protein and soy protein isolate). The large error bars for microbial protein and soy protein isolate indicate the variations in eco-efficiency scores for these two protein sources, which are due to different production contexts . Indeed, the results for the soy protein isolate were obtained from 10 different studies, resulting in different GWP scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large error bars for microbial protein and soy protein isolate indicate the variations in eco-efficiency scores for these two protein sources, which are due to different production contexts. 50 Indeed, the results for the soy protein isolate were obtained from 10 different studies, resulting in different GWP scores. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed for microbial protein by comparing the impact of different energy sources (hydropower vs average electricity mix in Finland) to produce this protein type, which led to different GWP scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improves digestibility and palatability, while allowing the safe consumption of protein isolates. Apart from phenolic compounds, carbohydrates are also removed by solvents to increase the protein content of the isolate …”
Section: General Processing Routes For Food Protein Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soy whey is the wastewater generated by soaking and boiling soybeans, or during tofu curd draining and soy protein isolate production . Soy whey is produced in abundant quantities, as approximately 9 kg of soy whey is generated from each kg of tofu produced. , Depending on the source and on the processing conditions, soy whey contains proteins in the range of 0.3–8.2 g/L, has a pH in the range of 5.4–6.6, and a high concentration of organic compounds. , This byproduct has a markedly limited shelf life (approximately 1 day), and its disposal remains challenging due to its organic load . In particular, the treatment of soy industry wastewater is expensive as a result of the high BOD and COD (6.8 and 12 g/L, respectively), and it is estimated to be on the order of 0.13 $/kg .…”
Section: Food Protein Waste Sources and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been one of the major sources of protein and oil for human food and livestock feed in Canada ( Singh and Hymowitz, 1999 ). Demand for this “king of beans” has been steadily increasing year-over-year due to its nutritional values for human and livestock, as well as industrial applications ( Thrane et al, 2017 ). This growing demand has created a significant market for varieties with increased seed quality and yield, along with a range of improved agronomic traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%