2019
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz103.sp768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sp768comparing Glycaemic Benefits of Active Versus Passive Lifestyle Intervention in Kidney Allograft Recipients (Caviar): A Randomised Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of physical activity, patients were encouraged to increase their performance and kept a training diary. This study did not con rm a different impact of active versus passive intervention on insulin sensitivity or secretion (20). The Dutch multicenter randomized study ACT (The Active Care after Transplantation) is currently underway, comparing 3 groups of patients (classic care, physical exercise intervention and combination of diet and exercise) with the primary aim to assess the impact of lifestyle changes on quality of life as well as degree of physical condition, adipose tissue and cardio-metabolic risk factors such as blood pressure, lipids, glucose metabolism (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of physical activity, patients were encouraged to increase their performance and kept a training diary. This study did not con rm a different impact of active versus passive intervention on insulin sensitivity or secretion (20). The Dutch multicenter randomized study ACT (The Active Care after Transplantation) is currently underway, comparing 3 groups of patients (classic care, physical exercise intervention and combination of diet and exercise) with the primary aim to assess the impact of lifestyle changes on quality of life as well as degree of physical condition, adipose tissue and cardio-metabolic risk factors such as blood pressure, lipids, glucose metabolism (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the reduction in body weight, BMI, waist circumference and lipid pro le parameters did not reach statistically signi cant in the multivariate model. In the CAVIAR study, the active intervention group achieved signi cant progress in weight and fat mass reduction in contrast to the passive group, which clearly contributes to improving the cardio-metabolic risk pro le of these patients (20). We also demonstrated a signi cant difference in waist circumference value reduction between patients in the intervention group, which was achieved by the subgroup with the highest level of sports exertion, which supports a direct relationship between the degree of physical activity and cardio-metabolic risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2014) showed no significant between‐group difference in body mass index (BMI) when comparing 12 months of exercise and nutrition counselling to usual care in obese KTRs. A RCT compared the effects of 6 months of face‐to‐face nutrition counselling and physical activity by a renal dietician, to usual care on insulin sensitivity in new KTRs (Kuningas et al ., 2019). Whilst there was no change in insulin sensitivity, the authors reported a significant mean between‐group difference in body weight over the 6‐month study (−2.47 kg [−4.01 to −0.92]; Kuningas et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of dietary interventions varied, although there were three broad models of delivery: personalised interventions; multidisciplinary team (MDT) interventions; and food‐based interventions. Personalised interventions included: telehealth to support dietary self‐management 20,21 ; individualised nutrition and exercise counselling 22 ; lifestyle advice using self‐monitoring 23 ; individualised nutrition education 24 ; and dietary intervention tailored to patient‐specific barriers 25,26 . MDT interventions included: cooking classes plus an exercise programme 27 and an integrated (hospital and community) care programme 28 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four cluster RCTs were rated high risk of bias relating to the timing of recruitment of the clusters. Other issues to highlight are: (i) very few studies reported whether confounding factors such as lipid‐lowering drugs, antihypertensive and steroid medications were equally balanced across groups at baseline or controlled for in analyses and (ii) none of the studies that reported on clinical outcomes were adequately powered to detect changes in such endpoints 21,23,28 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%