2018 SpaceOps Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space and Earth Terminal Sizing for Future Mars Missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This offers an especially attractive avenue for deployment of MOSAIC, where each deployed asset could act as an "infrastructure upgrade", providing communication, computation, and data analysis services for all subsequent assets. Agents participating in the MOSAIC could include Cubesats similar to MarCO [62], [63]; assets embedded in the "sky crane" lander and dropped during the "flyaway" phase [64], [65]; tethered balloons [66]; and aerostationary orbiters providing constant assistance to half the Mars surface [67], [68]. The algorithms proposed in this paper can be used during the system design phase to optimize the hardware of the distributed missions by simulating the scheduling problem in the loop with an iterative hardware trade space explorer such as [69].…”
Section: Reproducing Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This offers an especially attractive avenue for deployment of MOSAIC, where each deployed asset could act as an "infrastructure upgrade", providing communication, computation, and data analysis services for all subsequent assets. Agents participating in the MOSAIC could include Cubesats similar to MarCO [62], [63]; assets embedded in the "sky crane" lander and dropped during the "flyaway" phase [64], [65]; tethered balloons [66]; and aerostationary orbiters providing constant assistance to half the Mars surface [67], [68]. The algorithms proposed in this paper can be used during the system design phase to optimize the hardware of the distributed missions by simulating the scheduling problem in the loop with an iterative hardware trade space explorer such as [69].…”
Section: Reproducing Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the launch date of the proposed system is uncertain and well in the future, we need to make reasonable assumptions about optical technology progression over the coming decades. To that end we first surveyed similar studies done in the past (see [15]) and, based on their insights, defined the following three baseline technological states:…”
Section: Optical Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that a space terminal at Mars would be as described in a companion article 2 , that is, an Areostationary Mars-orbiting relay carrying a Ka-band (32 GHz) radio system with 940 W transmit power and a 6 m dish antenna for the return link, and capable of receiving a Ka-band (34.3 GHz) forward link. The Areostationary relay also carries a 50 cm optical telescope with three 15 W laser transmitters at 1550 nm, operating in parallel to provide the optical return link.…”
Section: A Space Terminal Near Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason we selected a 75 cm dish antenna for Ka-band return and forward links, and a 94 W Ka-band (34.3 GHz) transmitter. Following the system described in a companion article 2 , we assumed the Areostationary terminal at Mars transmits from a 6 m dish antenna, with 940 W at 32 GHz toward the relay. We patterned other radio characteristics after the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), as detailed in Table 1.…”
Section: B Deep Space Relay Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation