2022
DOI: 10.1177/09622802221079351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time interactions in Bayesian disease mapping with recent tools: Making things easier for practitioners

Abstract: Spatio-temporal disease mapping studies the distribution of mortality or incidence risks in space and its evolution in time, and it usually relies on fitting hierarchical Poisson mixed models. These models are complex for practitioners as they generally require adding constraints to correctly identify and interpret the different model terms. However, including constraints may not be straightforward in some recent software packages. This paper focuses on NIMBLE, a library of algorithms that contains among other… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this dissertation, we use the INLA method for approximate Bayesian inference (Rue et al, 2009), a widely popular estimation technique in the field of spatial statistics due to its faster computational speed compared to MCMC techniques. Recently, NIMBLE and INLA have been compared in a simulation study to fit spatio-temporal disease mapping models (Urdangarin et al, 2022). The results obtained are identical in terms of relative risk estimates and nearly identical in terms of parameter estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this dissertation, we use the INLA method for approximate Bayesian inference (Rue et al, 2009), a widely popular estimation technique in the field of spatial statistics due to its faster computational speed compared to MCMC techniques. Recently, NIMBLE and INLA have been compared in a simulation study to fit spatio-temporal disease mapping models (Urdangarin et al, 2022). The results obtained are identical in terms of relative risk estimates and nearly identical in terms of parameter estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%