1965
DOI: 10.1364/josa.55.001007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-Variant Image Formation*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in positron emission tomography (PET), patient motion during the relatively long scan times causes reconstructed images to be corrupted by nonlinear, nonuniform spatially variant motion blur [33,84]. Spatially variant blurs also occur when the object and image coordinates are tilted relative to each other, as well as in X-ray projection imaging [100], lens distortions [65], and wave aberrations [65]. Moreover, it is unlikely that the blur is truly spatially invariant in any realistic application, especially over large image planes.…”
Section: Image Deblurring and Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in positron emission tomography (PET), patient motion during the relatively long scan times causes reconstructed images to be corrupted by nonlinear, nonuniform spatially variant motion blur [33,84]. Spatially variant blurs also occur when the object and image coordinates are tilted relative to each other, as well as in X-ray projection imaging [100], lens distortions [65], and wave aberrations [65]. Moreover, it is unlikely that the blur is truly spatially invariant in any realistic application, especially over large image planes.…”
Section: Image Deblurring and Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step is to consider blurs that are spatially-variant (though often a localinvariance is assumed). Early relevant work includes [20], where the authors cleanly formalize space-variant imaging systems, and discuss basic special cases such as: piecewise space-invariant systems and geometric distortion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the field dependence of the aberrations, the imaging system is spatially variant in a strict sense [12]. However, within some small areas, the imaging system is approximately spatially invariant.…”
Section: Theory: Equal-pase Relation Between Conjugated Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, within some small areas, the imaging system is approximately spatially invariant. In other words, all aberrations are approximately constant in a piecewise manner (isoplanatism assumption) [12]. With this simplification, the image irradiance g (x', y') can be expressed as gç(x',y') = fr(X',Y')® hr(X',Y'), (3.1) where hr (', y') represents the point spread function of the aberrated imaging system and Jr (x', y') represents the rescaled and distorted replica ofthe object radiance distribution f(x, y),…”
Section: Theory: Equal-pase Relation Between Conjugated Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%