2018
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spaceflight-Induced Intracranial Hypertension and Visual Impairment: Pathophysiology and Countermeasures

Abstract: Visual impairment intracranial pressure (VIIP) syndrome is considered an unexplained major risk for future long-duration spaceflight. NASA recently redefined this syndrome as Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-ocular Syndrome (SANS). Evidence thus reviewed supports that chronic, mildly elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in space (as opposed to more variable ICP with posture and activity on Earth) is largely accounted for by loss of hydrostatic pressures and altered hemodynamics in the intracranial circulation and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
169
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
(452 reference statements)
2
169
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…60,78 CONCLUSION In summary, novel and unique neuro-ophthalmic findings have been documented in astronauts during and after LDSF and have been termed SANS. Although a single unifying and overreaching mechanism has yet to be proven, 1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]19,40,41,44,[55][56][57] and a multifactorial pathogenesis may be involved, it is likely that SANS may be the end result of cephalad fluid shifts to the brain and orbit brought about by extended MG exposure. Mao et al reviewed the impact of spaceflight and artificial gravity in a mouse retinal model using biochemical and proteomic analysis.…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…60,78 CONCLUSION In summary, novel and unique neuro-ophthalmic findings have been documented in astronauts during and after LDSF and have been termed SANS. Although a single unifying and overreaching mechanism has yet to be proven, 1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]19,40,41,44,[55][56][57] and a multifactorial pathogenesis may be involved, it is likely that SANS may be the end result of cephalad fluid shifts to the brain and orbit brought about by extended MG exposure. Mao et al reviewed the impact of spaceflight and artificial gravity in a mouse retinal model using biochemical and proteomic analysis.…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader is directed to both our own prior review articles but also the animal and human work performed by the many intramural and extramural NASA related partners working on SANS. [6][7][8][9] Despite the recognition and research related to SANS for many years, several unanswered questions remain: (1) What, if any, is the significance of potential preferential laterality (i.e., right-sided bias) seen in the anatomical changes of SANS? (unpublished data, personal communication WT); (2) Are there changes in the eye's anterior segment (in addition to the posterior segment findings) associated with SANS?…”
Section: Oct and Sansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent review, Zhang and Hargens (2018) emphasized that autoregulation of IOP is also influenced by the flow of aqueous humour in the anterior part of the eye, and any factors that modify this flow will consequently also influence IOP. The effect of factors associated with spaceflight on aqueous humour flow remains unresolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a human body enters microgravity during a space flight, gravity ceases to pull blood to the lower part of the body, causing blood and other body fluids to redistribute. This fluid shift is manifest in the well-documented decrease of leg volume (Fortrat et al, 2017;Thornton et al, 1987), putative increase in intracranial pressure (Zhang and Hargens, 2018) and face puffing (Kirsch et al, 1993). Blood redistribution is thought to be the key initiating event for cardiovascular adaptation to weightlessness (Watenpaugh and Hargens, 1996), followed by a decrease in blood volume (Johnson, 1979), due to loss of plasma (Smith et al, 1997) and erythrocytes (Ivanova et al, 2007;Noskov et al, 1991;Poliakov et al, 1998;Tavassoli, 1982), an increase of stroke volume (Norsk et al, 2015), and alterations of heart rate (Baevsky et al, 1997;Karemaker and Berecki-Gisolf, 2009;Verheyden et al, 2009) and central blood pressure regulation (Baevsky et al, 2007;Di Rienzo et al, 2008;Fritsch et al, 1992;Morita et al, 2016;Pagani et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%