Creative Placemaking 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315104607-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spaces of vernacular creativity reconsidered

Abstract: Our edited volume, Space of Vernacular Creativity: Rethinking the Cultural Economy (2009) critically responded to the preoccupations that had dominated writing on creative place-making. In this chapter, we focus on the book's key imperatives: to decentre instrumental and reductive conceptions about the location of creativity that were oriented around dominant notions of the 'creative economy', and interrogate how alternatively, creativity might be far more expansively conceived. We identify what remains salien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods open up avenues for a quiet politics and a more ‘gentle activism’ (Hawkins et al, 2015: 335). Therefore, although creativity is recognised as a contested concept, is semantically opaque and frequently politicised within cultural planning discourse (Gibson et al, 2012), this paper illustrates that grass roots or vernacular creativity (Edensor et al, 2009) is central to the emergence of fragile friendships among residents whose affective engagements with places ‘underground’ escape attention. The ‘underground’ arts space that is the focus of the paper is quite different from other community spaces that engage but also unintentionally segregate migrant newcomers and indigenous peoples – there are few opportunities for fleeting cross-cultural friendships.…”
Section: Darwinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The methods open up avenues for a quiet politics and a more ‘gentle activism’ (Hawkins et al, 2015: 335). Therefore, although creativity is recognised as a contested concept, is semantically opaque and frequently politicised within cultural planning discourse (Gibson et al, 2012), this paper illustrates that grass roots or vernacular creativity (Edensor et al, 2009) is central to the emergence of fragile friendships among residents whose affective engagements with places ‘underground’ escape attention. The ‘underground’ arts space that is the focus of the paper is quite different from other community spaces that engage but also unintentionally segregate migrant newcomers and indigenous peoples – there are few opportunities for fleeting cross-cultural friendships.…”
Section: Darwinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…People are putting their own kind of take on it … different stones in different formations… and sometimes the bank that’s left there is completely cleared and then it goes back.The multiple fragments of stone and concrete that surround the Henge constitute potential building materials for ad hoc structures, and outside the circle, pictograms, slogans and names designed out of this excess material disappear and reappear. This ludic, vernacular creativity (Edensor and Millington, 2018) supplements more sustained artistic involvements.…”
Section: Multiple Creative Practices At Achill Henge: Play Performanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other spaces in legal ‘grey areas’ which have been co-opted into place marketing strategies, such as Berlin’s wastelands or Copenhagen’s Freetown Christiania, for instance (Colomb, 2012; Ntounis and Kanellopoulou, 2017), Achill Henge has been ignored by local political and commercial interests, despite drawing visitors from further afield. It thus sidesteps neoliberal appropriations of creativity (Edensor and Millington, 2018). Its controversial origins and significance mean it has not been incorporated into Mayo’s official tourist product.…”
Section: Multiple Creative Practices At Achill Henge: Play Performanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Everyday creativity appreciates that society has moved from a culture owned and created by a few (in this case professional eyebrow artists) to a culture created by everyone. Creativity has come to be recognized as more widely distributed and reductive as opposed to elitist (Edensor and Millington, 2018). In other words, one need not have a particularly creative personality (e.g.…”
Section: Everyday Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%