1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01320097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice

Abstract: THE SPACING EFFECTAsk almost any student of learning and memory and he/she will tell you that the spacing effect refers to the finding that for a given amount of study time, spaced presentations yield significantly better learning than do presentations that are massed more closely together in time. The spacing effect is, in fact, one of the most thoroughly studied phenomena in psychology. However, what is not so widely appreciated is just how remarkable the spacing effect is.Consider, for example, its impressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
133
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(145 reference statements)
5
133
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The spacing effect has been successfully applied in the classroom as well as in patients with cognitive deficits (Schacter et al 1985;Dempster 1989). Consistent with the literature, we report here that animals trained with spaced trials tended to learn faster and remember longer than animals exposed to the same amount of massed trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The spacing effect has been successfully applied in the classroom as well as in patients with cognitive deficits (Schacter et al 1985;Dempster 1989). Consistent with the literature, we report here that animals trained with spaced trials tended to learn faster and remember longer than animals exposed to the same amount of massed trials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, several hypotheses could be generated about the optimal timing of feedback. However, we predicted that delayed feedback would lead to superior performance in comparison with immediate feedback because of the added benefits of allowing the incorrect response to dissipate (see, e.g., Kulhavy & Anderson, 1972) and providing a spaced presentation of the material (see Dempster, 1989) in the case of delayed feedback.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Ruth (1928), Dempster (1989), and Donovan and Radosevich (1999) for thorough meta-analyses spanning several decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%