2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-010-9587-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPAD chlorophyll meter reading can be pronouncedly affected by chloroplast movement

Abstract: Non-destructive assessment of chlorophyll content has recently been widely done by chlorophyll meters based on measurement of leaf transmittance (e.g. the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter measures the leaf transmittance at 650 and 940 nm). However, the leaf transmittance depends not only on the content of chlorophylls but also on their distribution in leaves. The chlorophyll distribution within leaves is co-determined by chloroplast arrangement in cells that depends on light conditions. When tobacco leaves were expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
3
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
74
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that SPAD meter readings can be influenced by changing growth conditions that, for example, may lead to a redistribution of chloroplasts within mesophyll cells (Naus et al 2010). For this reason, it is advisable to always include an internal control in each experiment, as a point of reference, and to be cautious about making comparisons between experiments conducted on different occasions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that SPAD meter readings can be influenced by changing growth conditions that, for example, may lead to a redistribution of chloroplasts within mesophyll cells (Naus et al 2010). For this reason, it is advisable to always include an internal control in each experiment, as a point of reference, and to be cautious about making comparisons between experiments conducted on different occasions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be caused by species-specific leaf structure, adaptation to the local light environments, nutrients availability and other abiotic and biotic factors which may modify leaf optical properties. Additionally, the SPAD readings can be significantly affected by the sieve effect and optical path lengthening caused by high heterogeneity in Chl distribution within a leaf (Uddling et al 2007;Marenco et al 2009;Nauš et al 2010). In our study species, the differences in the relationship between the SPAD readings and real Chl content cannot rather be attributed to the chloroplast movement because the measurements were conducted at the same time on each occasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To reduce the impact of daily chloroplasts movement on SPAD values, the measurements in each individual sampling time were conducted at the same day time from 9:00 to 12:00 (Nauš et al 2010). The meter head was placed at adaxial leaf surface avoiding a mid-vein.…”
Section: Measurements With Spad Chl Metermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPAD values are calculated through the amount of light transmitted by the leaf in red light (650 nm) and infrared light (940 nm), which have different absorbance induced by chlorophyll. Although the relationship between SPAD values and chlorophyll contents could be linear, exponential or polynomial correlations for various kinds of plants species have been reported; this relationship could be affected by light conditions, chloroplast distribution or the level of chlorophyll concentrations, but overall, the dynamic curve of SPAD values could be used as the indicator of leaf chlorophyll contents (Markwell et al 1995, v www.esajournals.org Muraoka and Koizumi 2005, Uddling et al 2007, Naus et al 2010, Ling et al 2011, Nagai et al 2011, Djumaeva et al 2012, Scattolin et al 2013, Riccardi et al 2014. Furthermore, the daily leaf area index (LAI) values (lower frequency after the end of leaf expansion) within ROI were collected with the leaf area meter LAI-2200 (Li-COR, Nebraska, USA) at the same time with other measurements.…”
Section: Canopy Images Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%