1996
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPAF-III results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison between aspirin and oral anticoagulants In different clinical circumstances, oral anticoagulants have been shown to be more effective than aspirin (56); also, the combined use of both has proven more effective than separate administration (57). However, few trials have dealt with the comparison of aspirin and oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention of heart disease.…”
Section: Oral Anticoagulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison between aspirin and oral anticoagulants In different clinical circumstances, oral anticoagulants have been shown to be more effective than aspirin (56); also, the combined use of both has proven more effective than separate administration (57). However, few trials have dealt with the comparison of aspirin and oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention of heart disease.…”
Section: Oral Anticoagulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three studies-CARS, Thrombosis Prevention Trial, and CHAMP-point to a probable need for higher INR levels similar to those offering better results in other diseases such as cardiac valve replacement (42,65) or atrial fibrillation, for which an INR of 2 to 3 offers greater protection against thromboembolism than a lower INR (56).…”
Section: Comparison Between Aspirin and Oral Anticoagulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%