2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-10405-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spam detection on Twitter using a support vector machine and users’ features by identifying their interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kai-Cheng et al [8] extracted two types of features, including raw data like follower count and derived features like follower growth rate and the length of the screen name. Saleh et al [9] summarized a bunch of features according to account information like age, length of the name, and count of followers and then used a support vector machine to separate bots from genuine users. Hrushikesh et al [10] ensemble the prediction results of three machine learning models to improve the classifying accuracy after a comprehensive account features collection, e.g., location, profile image, and daily average tweet count, and so on.…”
Section: Bot Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kai-Cheng et al [8] extracted two types of features, including raw data like follower count and derived features like follower growth rate and the length of the screen name. Saleh et al [9] summarized a bunch of features according to account information like age, length of the name, and count of followers and then used a support vector machine to separate bots from genuine users. Hrushikesh et al [10] ensemble the prediction results of three machine learning models to improve the classifying accuracy after a comprehensive account features collection, e.g., location, profile image, and daily average tweet count, and so on.…”
Section: Bot Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%