2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2889474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Bayesian Learning Based Space-Time Adaptive Processing Against Unknown Mutual Coupling for Airborne Radar Using Middle Subarray

Abstract: Sparse-recovery-based space-time adaptive processing (STAP) methods can exhibit superior clutter suppression performance with limited training data. However, the clutter suppression performance seriously degrades when the mutual coupling is present in the STAP array elements. In this paper, a sparse Bayesian learning (SBL)-based STAP method against the mutual coupling by using the middle subarray is proposed. Specifically, the mutual coupling matrix (MCM) of the STAP uniform linear array is approximately descr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 8, only the clutter sparsity is exploited, where the sparsity of the STAP filter weight vector w represents the clutter sparsity. In addition, the other methods also exploit only the clutter sparsity [12]- [18].…”
Section: The Proposed Joint Sparse Stap Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 8, only the clutter sparsity is exploited, where the sparsity of the STAP filter weight vector w represents the clutter sparsity. In addition, the other methods also exploit only the clutter sparsity [12]- [18].…”
Section: The Proposed Joint Sparse Stap Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, motivated by the sparsity of clutter, many sparse STAP methods have been proposed [12]- [21], and they can be divided into two categories: the direct method [12]- [18] and the indirect method [19]- [21]. The direct method exploits directly the clutter sparsity to reconstruct the lowrank clutter covariance matrix (CCM) in STAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sparsity-based STAP method with array gain/phase (GP) error self-calibration has been developed in [ 48 ], which iteratively solves an SR problem and an LS calibration problem. In [ 49 ], utilizing the specific structure of the mutual coupling matrix, a mutual coupling calibration method is developed for SBL-STAP by rearranging the received snapshots with the designed spatial-temporal selection matrix. In [ 50 ], under the framework of the alternating direction method (ADM), a constraint is added to the array GP errors, and the conventional sparsity-based STAP problem is transformed into a joint optimization problem of the angle-Doppler profile and the array GP errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the MCM of uniform linear array (ULA) is a banded Toeplitz structure [6]. Various adaptive calibration methods based on MCM are proposed [7]- [15]. In [7], the theory of characteristic modes is used to characterize the mutual coupling effect, and a compensation matrix is constructed to compensate the mutual coupling effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], by taking advantage of the banded symmetric Toeplitz structure of MCM and subspace, the closed form mutual coupling coefficients are estimated, and a robust adaptive beamformer can be formed by the reconstructed interference plus noise covariance matrix. A STAP method based on sparse bayesian learning is proposed by utilizing the middle subarray [15]. Although advanced progress has been made in estimating MCM, it is still difficult to estimate accurately MCM in the heterogeneous environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%