2021
DOI: 10.1049/ipr2.12155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse representation for face recognition: A review paper

Abstract: With the increasing use of surveillance cameras, face recognition is being studied by many researchers for security purposes. Although high accuracy has been achieved for frontal faces, the existing methods have shown poor performance for occluded and corrupt images. Recently, sparse representation based classification (SRC) has shown the state-ofthe-art result in face recognition on corrupt and occluded face images. Several researchers have developed extended SRC methods in the last decade. This paper mainly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline network for the ablation experiments still chooses ResNet50 as the base comparison model because the CSINet network proposed in this paper modifies and adds three main modules to ResNet50. In strategy (a), the ResNet50 network obtains recognition accuracies of 76.43% and 79.31% on the data sets RAF-DB and FERPlus, respectively, and in strategy (b), the Attention Residual Module [50] is replaced with the traditional basic residual structure in ResNet50. The recognition accuracies on the data sets are improved by 7.86% and 5.88%, respectively, which is an increase of a large magnitude that indicates that the ARM module improves the ability to extract important features from the bottom layer of the network.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline network for the ablation experiments still chooses ResNet50 as the base comparison model because the CSINet network proposed in this paper modifies and adds three main modules to ResNet50. In strategy (a), the ResNet50 network obtains recognition accuracies of 76.43% and 79.31% on the data sets RAF-DB and FERPlus, respectively, and in strategy (b), the Attention Residual Module [50] is replaced with the traditional basic residual structure in ResNet50. The recognition accuracies on the data sets are improved by 7.86% and 5.88%, respectively, which is an increase of a large magnitude that indicates that the ARM module improves the ability to extract important features from the bottom layer of the network.…”
Section: Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose is to make the recognition effect more obvious [38,39]. With the constraint of R ys , the above formula can reduce the intraclass spacing of face feature samples and adjust the weight of each layer in a direction more conducive to face recognition [40].…”
Section: Fast Recognition Of Face Image Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%