1969
DOI: 10.2307/2258225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spartina × Townsendii H. & J. Groves Sensu Lato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S. anglica is able to spread in three ways: clonal growth, dislodging of rhizome fragments and seed dispersal. Both, fragments and seeds may drift with tidal currents into new habitats (Goodman et al 1969). Ko¨nig (1948) concluded that this neophyte spreads most effectively by seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. anglica is able to spread in three ways: clonal growth, dislodging of rhizome fragments and seed dispersal. Both, fragments and seeds may drift with tidal currents into new habitats (Goodman et al 1969). Ko¨nig (1948) concluded that this neophyte spreads most effectively by seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid first occurred near Hythe in Southampton Water sometime before 1870 and was first recognized in 1878 and named S. townsendii (Groves & Groves 1880). The fertile amphiploid, S. anglica, arose around 1890 and successfully colonized a zone of mudflats not occupied by its parents but by scattered populations of Salicornia (Hubbard 1957;Goodman et al 1969) Subsequent invasion was rapid, both by natural spread and by widespread introductions (Doody 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 35 (RARROSO et al 1997) and40 (GOODMAN 1996) MYBP datings for this divergence were obtained through applying an arbitrary correction factor of 25/22 to the age of fossils considered relevant to the divergence between Old and New World monkeys. This correction factor (GOODMAN et al 1998) was derived from a postulated age of 25 MY for the divergence between Cercopithecoidea and Hominoidea, divided by the age (22 MY) of the oldest fossils (Kenyupithecus, Victoriapithectts) assumed to be related to this split. The divergence between Catarrhini and Platyrrhini was then estimated to have occurred either z 35 or % 40 MYBP, depending on whether the age of certain platyrrhine fossils (Branisella; x 30 MY) or of the African (Fayum) fossil Catopithecus ( FZ 35 MY) were used in the calculation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%