2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spasticity Measurement Based on Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using the PediAnklebot

Abstract: Nowadays, objective measures are becoming prominent in spasticity assessment, to overcome limitations of clinical scales. Among others, Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold (TSRT) showed promising results. Previous studies demonstrated the validity and reliability of TSRT in spasticity assessment at elbow and ankle joints in adults. Purposes of the present study were to assess: (i) the feasibility of measuring TSRT to evaluate spasticity at the ankle joint in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), and (ii) the correlati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, even if a significant difference with the healthy subjects was found, our results indicate that their reliability was poor, and, in addition, they do not show meaningful correlation with the clinical scale (i.e., the MAS clinically evaluated). With respect to the lack of correlation with the clinical assessment, our results are in accordance with those already reported in literature, where instrumental assessments of spasticity usually appear uncorrelated with the clinical counterparts [57][58][59]. In fact, the psychometric properties of the clinical assessment of spasticity are very low [60] and, therefore, they cannot act as golden standard, supporting the search of new tools to objectively quantify the spasticity.…”
Section: Spasticitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In fact, even if a significant difference with the healthy subjects was found, our results indicate that their reliability was poor, and, in addition, they do not show meaningful correlation with the clinical scale (i.e., the MAS clinically evaluated). With respect to the lack of correlation with the clinical assessment, our results are in accordance with those already reported in literature, where instrumental assessments of spasticity usually appear uncorrelated with the clinical counterparts [57][58][59]. In fact, the psychometric properties of the clinical assessment of spasticity are very low [60] and, therefore, they cannot act as golden standard, supporting the search of new tools to objectively quantify the spasticity.…”
Section: Spasticitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Currently, the design of robotic devices for the rehabilitation of children is an increasingly appealing and challenging field [16,[31][32][33][34]. However, properly scaling robotic devices designed for adults to match the characteristics of children, remains an existing challenge, and is generally recognized as an important goal to achieve in the robotic field [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each task was performed three times randomizing the task order across subjects to avoid bias in results due to similar task sequences. In addition, subjects were not advised about frequency, to avoid habituation of postural responses or anticipatory strategies due to predictability [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%